COMPARISON OF WOUND INFECTION AFTER PILONIDAL SINUS EXCISION WITH PRIMARY REPAIR VERSUS FLAP COVERAGE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Background: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the sacrococcygeal region, often seen in young adults. Its management poses a surgical dilemma due to varied treatment options and recurrence risks. Primary midline closure is widely practiced due to procedural simplicity, but it is frequently associated with higher complication rates. Flap techniques offer an alternative with potential benefits in wound healing and infection control. This study compares the clinical efficacy and recovery outcomes of Primary Repair and Flap Coverage techniques in PSD excision. Objective: To evaluate and compare the postoperative outcomes, wound healing patterns, and infection severity between Primary Repair and Flap Repair techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 70 patients diagnosed with PSD, divided equally into Primary Repair (n=35) and Flap Repair (n=35) groups. Patient demographics including age, sex, BMI, smoking status, and previous abscess history were recorded. Postoperative parameters—hospital stay, wound healing duration, and wound condition—were assessed using the Surgical Wound Assessment and Analysis (SWAA) scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: The Primary Repair group had a shorter mean hospital stay (3.31 ± 1.06 days) compared to the Flap Repair group (3.74 ± 1.55 days). Mean wound healing duration was also faster in the Primary Repair group (23.66 ± 20.88 days) versus Flap Repair (30.26 ± 14.33 days). However, the SWAA score indicated more favorable wound outcomes in the Flap group (0.74 ± 1.25) compared to Primary Repair (1.14 ± 1.57; p = 0.03). Smoking prevalence was higher in the Primary Repair group (20.0% vs. 11.4%). Conclusion: Primary Repair provides a faster recovery with shorter hospitalization, while Flap Repair results in superior wound healing quality. Personalized surgical planning based on patient risk profiles is essential to optimize treatment outcomes for pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/vc8fs302
Primary Topic
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF WOUND INFECTION AFTER PILONIDAL SINUS EXCISION WITH PRIMARY REPAIR VERSUS FLAP COVERAGE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Fatima Tuz Zahra, Ayesha Jamal, Sahar Fatima, Amna Batool et al.
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
article

COMPARISON OF WOUND INFECTION AFTER PILONIDAL SINUS EXCISION WITH PRIMARY REPAIR VERSUS FLAP COVERAGE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Fatima Tuz Zahra, Ayesha Jamal, Sahar Fatima, Amna Batool, Urooj Fatima, Rizwan Sultan, Abdur R. Aftab, Sharmeen Nadeem Jokhio, Farzan Junaid
article en

Abstract

Background: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the sacrococcygeal region, often seen in young adults. Its management poses a surgical dilemma due to varied treatment options and recurrence risks. Primary midline closure is widely practiced due to procedural simplicity, but it is frequently associated with higher complication rates. Flap techniques offer an alternative with potential benefits in wound healing and infection control. This study compares the clinical efficacy and recovery outcomes of Primary Repair and Flap Coverage techniques in PSD excision. Objective: To evaluate and compare the postoperative outcomes, wound healing patterns, and infection severity between Primary Repair and Flap Repair techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 70 patients diagnosed with PSD, divided equally into Primary Repair (n=35) and Flap Repair (n=35) groups. Patient demographics including age, sex, BMI, smoking status, and previous abscess history were recorded. Postoperative parameters—hospital stay, wound healing duration, and wound condition—were assessed using the Surgical Wound Assessment and Analysis (SWAA) scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: The Primary Repair group had a shorter mean hospital stay (3.31 ± 1.06 days) compared to the Flap Repair group (3.74 ± 1.55 days). Mean wound healing duration was also faster in the Primary Repair group (23.66 ± 20.88 days) versus Flap Repair (30.26 ± 14.33 days). However, the SWAA score indicated more favorable wound outcomes in the Flap group (0.74 ± 1.25) compared to Primary Repair (1.14 ± 1.57; p = 0.03). Smoking prevalence was higher in the Primary Repair group (20.0% vs. 11.4%). Conclusion: Primary Repair provides a faster recovery with shorter hospitalization, while Flap Repair results in superior wound healing quality. Personalized surgical planning based on patient risk profiles is essential to optimize treatment outcomes for pilonidal sinus disease.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 3(3 (Health & Allied))
Shifa International Hospital (PK), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.