The evolution of scientific writing: an analysis of 20 million abstracts over 70 years in health and medical science

Abstract For at least a century, scientists have been concerned with the need for clear scientific writing. This concern has grown with the advent of the internet allowing for global, interdisciplinary collaboration. In this study, we used R software to analyse over twenty million abstracts from scientific papers in the health and medical fields — tracking changes in the frequency with which different writing components have been used since the 1950s. This historical understanding provides insight into our past writing cultures, how they have changed, and where we stand as science communicators today. We found that scientists are increasingly using writing components that reduce cognitive load and improve reader understanding. Despite these positive efforts we found that many scientists still feel a need to adhere to ‘The Official Style’ that falls back on dense and difficult prose. We advocate for more accessible science writing so that its discoveries not only encourage inter-disciplinary research, but are also spread across wider society as part of the sharing of knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientometrics
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05353-8
Primary Topic
Academic Writing and Publishing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The evolution of scientific writing: an analysis of 20 million abstracts over 70 years in health and medical science

Adrian Barnett, Sean D. Connell, Neil A. King, Mollie Hawkes Hohmann
Scientometrics
Academic Writing and Publishing
article

The evolution of scientific writing: an analysis of 20 million abstracts over 70 years in health and medical science

Adrian Barnett, Sean D. Connell, Neil A. King, Mollie Hawkes Hohmann
article en

Abstract

Abstract For at least a century, scientists have been concerned with the need for clear scientific writing. This concern has grown with the advent of the internet allowing for global, interdisciplinary collaboration. In this study, we used R software to analyse over twenty million abstracts from scientific papers in the health and medical fields — tracking changes in the frequency with which different writing components have been used since the 1950s. This historical understanding provides insight into our past writing cultures, how they have changed, and where we stand as science communicators today. We found that scientists are increasingly using writing components that reduce cognitive load and improve reader understanding. Despite these positive efforts we found that many scientists still feel a need to adhere to ‘The Official Style’ that falls back on dense and difficult prose. We advocate for more accessible science writing so that its discoveries not only encourage inter-disciplinary research, but are also spread across wider society as part of the sharing of knowledge.

ScientometricsVol. 130(7)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
University of Adelaide
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Academic Writing and Publishing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The evolution of scientific writing: an analysis of 20 million abstracts over 70 years in health and medical science — Adrian Barnett, Sean D. Connell, et al. · Scientometrics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS