The consequences of expanded audit reporting: implications of tax key audit matters for tax attribute valuation and auditor-provided tax services

Abstract This study examines the consequences of tax key audit matters (KAMs) to the valuation of tax attributes and to auditor-provided tax services (APTS). The literature finds that KAM adoption is not associated with investor or audit outcomes, creating an impetus to identify whether specific KAM topics are more consequential. Tax KAMs are an ideal setting because they are prevalent, taxes are economically important, and auditors can provide tax services to their clients. We find that investors discount the tax avoidance and deferred tax assets of tax-KAM companies, suggesting an incentive for managers to avoid tax KAMs. Consistent with self-interest threats to auditor independence, we find that receiving a tax KAM is negatively associated with clients’ concurrent purchases of APTS, but that clients increase their future purchases of these services when they stop receiving tax KAMs. These results reveal novel consequences of tax KAMs to the valuation of companies’ tax attributes and to APTS incentives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Accounting Studies
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-025-09884-6
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The consequences of expanded audit reporting: implications of tax key audit matters for tax attribute valuation and auditor-provided tax services

Aaron Mandell, Daniel P. Lynch, Linette M. Rousseau
5 citations
Review of Accounting Studies
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
19.55
article

The consequences of expanded audit reporting: implications of tax key audit matters for tax attribute valuation and auditor-provided tax services

Aaron Mandell, Daniel P. Lynch, Linette M. Rousseau
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the consequences of tax key audit matters (KAMs) to the valuation of tax attributes and to auditor-provided tax services (APTS). The literature finds that KAM adoption is not associated with investor or audit outcomes, creating an impetus to identify whether specific KAM topics are more consequential. Tax KAMs are an ideal setting because they are prevalent, taxes are economically important, and auditors can provide tax services to their clients. We find that investors discount the tax avoidance and deferred tax assets of tax-KAM companies, suggesting an incentive for managers to avoid tax KAMs. Consistent with self-interest threats to auditor independence, we find that receiving a tax KAM is negatively associated with clients’ concurrent purchases of APTS, but that clients increase their future purchases of these services when they stop receiving tax KAMs. These results reveal novel consequences of tax KAMs to the valuation of companies’ tax attributes and to APTS incentives.

Review of Accounting StudiesVol. 30(4)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US), University of Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
19.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.