Double Modal Construction in Southern American English

The Double Modal Construction (DMC) in English has traditionally been regarded as a peripheral phenomenon, characteristic of certain dialects in Old, Middle, and Modem English, and thus considered to fall outside the scope of Core Grammar. To analyze the structure of declarative DMC sentences, various theories have been proposed by examining their behavior in interrogatives, negatives, and tag questions. Building on Battistella’s (1995) framework, the present study argues that M, in DMCs possesses adverbial properties in syntactic terms. Furthermore, by situating the MP between NegP and VP, as opposed to above TP, the analysis demonstrates that M<sub>1</sub> does not obstruct the movement of M<sub>2</sub> to the clause-initial position in interrogative constructions. In negative constructions, it is also shown that the negator not associated with M<sub>1</sub> functions as phrasal negation targeting an adverbial phrase, while the not or n’t associated with M<sub>2</sub> belongs to NegP and represents sentential negation. Ultimately, this study concludes that DMCs are best understood not as part of Peripheral Grammar, but as a legitimate structure within the Core Grammar. (Chungnam National University)

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Studies in English Language & Literature
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17754/mesk.69.2.49
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Double Modal Construction in Southern American English

Ungsik Kim
Modern Studies in English Language & Literature
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Double Modal Construction in Southern American English

Ungsik Kim
article en

Abstract

The Double Modal Construction (DMC) in English has traditionally been regarded as a peripheral phenomenon, characteristic of certain dialects in Old, Middle, and Modem English, and thus considered to fall outside the scope of Core Grammar. To analyze the structure of declarative DMC sentences, various theories have been proposed by examining their behavior in interrogatives, negatives, and tag questions. Building on Battistella’s (1995) framework, the present study argues that M, in DMCs possesses adverbial properties in syntactic terms. Furthermore, by situating the MP between NegP and VP, as opposed to above TP, the analysis demonstrates that M<sub>1</sub> does not obstruct the movement of M<sub>2</sub> to the clause-initial position in interrogative constructions. In negative constructions, it is also shown that the negator not associated with M<sub>1</sub> functions as phrasal negation targeting an adverbial phrase, while the not or n’t associated with M<sub>2</sub> belongs to NegP and represents sentential negation. Ultimately, this study concludes that DMCs are best understood not as part of Peripheral Grammar, but as a legitimate structure within the Core Grammar. (Chungnam National University)

Modern Studies in English Language & LiteratureVol. 69(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.