Doctoral Education in Design: The Administrative Challenges

This article explores the overlooked realm of social and academic infrastructure crucial for successfully implementing doctoral programs in design disciplines.Highlighting the indeterminacy of doctoral education in design and diverse administrative models, it reports on a panel discussion of experienced scholars that were gathered during a conference of the Design Research Society to share best practices and essential considerations.Emphasizing the pivotal role of doctoral education in shaping disciplinary knowledge, the conversation confronts wide disparities in program administration and support.It navigates key questions on infrastructural requirements, student needs, quality evaluation, and institutional variations.By fostering collaborative dialogue, it aims to advance more equitable and effective doctoral education in design.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sciences du Design
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3917/sdd.020.0032
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Doctoral Education in Design: The Administrative Challenges

Sébastien Proulx, Rachel Cooper, Carlos Teixeira, William Nickley et al.
Sciences du Design
Design Education and Practice
article

Doctoral Education in Design: The Administrative Challenges

Sébastien Proulx, Rachel Cooper, Carlos Teixeira, William Nickley, Fabienne Münch, Lorenzo Imbesi, Philippe Gauthier
article en

Abstract

This article explores the overlooked realm of social and academic infrastructure crucial for successfully implementing doctoral programs in design disciplines.Highlighting the indeterminacy of doctoral education in design and diverse administrative models, it reports on a panel discussion of experienced scholars that were gathered during a conference of the Design Research Society to share best practices and essential considerations.Emphasizing the pivotal role of doctoral education in shaping disciplinary knowledge, the conversation confronts wide disparities in program administration and support.It navigates key questions on infrastructural requirements, student needs, quality evaluation, and institutional variations.By fostering collaborative dialogue, it aims to advance more equitable and effective doctoral education in design.

Sciences du DesignVol. n° 20(2)
Ohio State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.