COMPARISON OF METRICS USED TO QUANTIFY THE ACCURACY OF AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES

COMPARISON OF METRICS USED TO QUANTIFY THE ACCURACY OF AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES COMPARISON OF METRICS USED TO QUANTIFY THE ACCURACY OF AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES ≡ Human and space

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Людина і космос.
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62717/2221-4550-2025-1-129
Primary Topic
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF METRICS USED TO QUANTIFY THE ACCURACY OF AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES

O. Ukrayinec
Людина і космос.
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
article

COMPARISON OF METRICS USED TO QUANTIFY THE ACCURACY OF AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES

O. Ukrayinec
article en

Abstract

COMPARISON OF METRICS USED TO QUANTIFY THE ACCURACY OF AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES COMPARISON OF METRICS USED TO QUANTIFY THE ACCURACY OF AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES ≡ Human and space

Людина і космос.
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.