The Death Penalty’s Abolition and Infanticide’s Invention: A Neglected Nexus

Abstract Decades before Canada abolished the death penalty, it removed infanticide from the Criminal Code ’s offences punishable by death. In 1948, this form of culpable homicide became punishable by imprisonment up to a maximum of three years. Although this statutory invention has been linked to the post-war rise in the pathologization of women’s violence and tied to legislators’ concerns over jury nullification, its nexus with the death penalty’s abolition has been overlooked. If the prospect of capital punishment did not deter women from killing their newborns, could the death penalty be justified for other forms of culpable homicide? Critics who posed this question about neonaticide wedged open the consideration of other forms of homicide and categories of offenders, undermining long standing certainties over the deterrent potency of capital punishment. Rather than a step in the abolition movement, the amendment merits acknowledgment as a significant move against the death penalty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2024.36
Primary Topic
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Death Penalty’s Abolition and Infanticide’s Invention: A Neglected Nexus

Carolyn Strange
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
article

The Death Penalty’s Abolition and Infanticide’s Invention: A Neglected Nexus

Carolyn Strange
article en

Abstract

Abstract Decades before Canada abolished the death penalty, it removed infanticide from the Criminal Code ’s offences punishable by death. In 1948, this form of culpable homicide became punishable by imprisonment up to a maximum of three years. Although this statutory invention has been linked to the post-war rise in the pathologization of women’s violence and tied to legislators’ concerns over jury nullification, its nexus with the death penalty’s abolition has been overlooked. If the prospect of capital punishment did not deter women from killing their newborns, could the death penalty be justified for other forms of culpable homicide? Critics who posed this question about neonaticide wedged open the consideration of other forms of homicide and categories of offenders, undermining long standing certainties over the deterrent potency of capital punishment. Rather than a step in the abolition movement, the amendment merits acknowledgment as a significant move against the death penalty.

Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et SociétéVol. 40(1)
Australian National University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Death Penalty’s Abolition and Infanticide’s Invention: A Neglected Nexus — Carolyn Strange · Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS