Global shocks and local sellers: Kenyan fertilizer markets’ response to the fuel-fertilizer-food price crisis

• The 2020 – 2022 crisis increased price dispersion in Kenya’s fertilizer markets. • During the crisis peak, DAP prices rose 81 % on average, ranging from −5% to + 138 %. • Retail prices respond more rapidly to import price increases than decreases. • Price transmission is faster in high-production and slower in poorer regions. • The NFSP slows retail price adjustment, especially near its distribution centers. Global fertilizer prices doubled during the 2020–2022 fuel-fertilizer-food crisis, pushing an additional 210 million people into acute food insecurity. We use transaction-level data from agro-dealers to analyze how this global shock transmitted through Kenyan retail markets. How global price shocks spread across rural markets to affect firms and farmers in low-income countries remains poorly understood. We show that retail fertilizer prices in Kenya rose 81% on average during the crisis, with remarkable spatial variation ranging from 5% decreases to 138% increases across shops. We use dyadic panel analysis to identify changes in price transmission and in market integration across Kenyan fertilizer retailers and to evaluate the effects of government policy intervention. We find evidence of asymmetric price transmission; agro-dealer prices responded faster to import price increases than decreases. We show that larger shops and major agricultural production zones experienced faster price transmission and stronger integration with import markets relative to high-poverty areas. Kenya’s National Fertilizer Subsidy Program slowed price transmission but may have prolonged higher fertilizer retail prices. Our results imply that farmers do not benefit as rapidly from input price reductions as they would under symmetric transmission. Our results also demonstrate that global shocks transmit unevenly across markets, suggesting effective stabilization policies should account for heterogeneity in market conditions and variable pass-through behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Policy
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102889
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global shocks and local sellers: Kenyan fertilizer markets’ response to the fuel-fertilizer-food price crisis

Hope Michelson, Pieter Rutsaert, Jason Donovan, Teresa Serra et al.
1 citations
Food Policy
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
3.13
article

Global shocks and local sellers: Kenyan fertilizer markets’ response to the fuel-fertilizer-food price crisis

Hope Michelson, Pieter Rutsaert, Jason Donovan, Teresa Serra, Colleta N. Khaemba, Hanna S. Willwerth
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• The 2020 – 2022 crisis increased price dispersion in Kenya’s fertilizer markets. • During the crisis peak, DAP prices rose 81 % on average, ranging from −5% to + 138 %. • Retail prices respond more rapidly to import price increases than decreases. • Price transmission is faster in high-production and slower in poorer regions. • The NFSP slows retail price adjustment, especially near its distribution centers. Global fertilizer prices doubled during the 2020–2022 fuel-fertilizer-food crisis, pushing an additional 210 million people into acute food insecurity. We use transaction-level data from agro-dealers to analyze how this global shock transmitted through Kenyan retail markets. How global price shocks spread across rural markets to affect firms and farmers in low-income countries remains poorly understood. We show that retail fertilizer prices in Kenya rose 81% on average during the crisis, with remarkable spatial variation ranging from 5% decreases to 138% increases across shops. We use dyadic panel analysis to identify changes in price transmission and in market integration across Kenyan fertilizer retailers and to evaluate the effects of government policy intervention. We find evidence of asymmetric price transmission; agro-dealer prices responded faster to import price increases than decreases. We show that larger shops and major agricultural production zones experienced faster price transmission and stronger integration with import markets relative to high-poverty areas. Kenya’s National Fertilizer Subsidy Program slowed price transmission but may have prolonged higher fertilizer retail prices. Our results imply that farmers do not benefit as rapidly from input price reductions as they would under symmetric transmission. Our results also demonstrate that global shocks transmit unevenly across markets, suggesting effective stabilization policies should account for heterogeneity in market conditions and variable pass-through behavior.

Food PolicyVol. 133
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Urbana University (US), Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX), International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (BD), International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (KE), Universidad de Montevideo (UY)
United States Agency for International Development, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research, Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.