Experimental comparison of heat storage pots containing powdered iron filings and erythritol using parabolic dish solar cookers

Abstract Solar cookers cannot be used without heat storage during cloudy periods or at night. Heat storage can be used for cooking during cloudy periods and at night. Two storage cooking pots are thus experimentally evaluated to compare their heat storage performances. A latent heat storage material (erythritol) is compared with a sensible heat storage material (powdered iron filings) during solar cooking periods using parabolic dish solar cookers and during storage cooking periods using wonderbag insulating solar cookers. The powdered iron filings storage pot shows a faster temperature rise during the no-load test, attaining a maximum pot temperature above 200 °C compared to 190 °C for the erythritol due to the higher thermal conductivity of iron filings. However, the storage temperature for erythritol at the end of the no-load lest is around 180 °C compared to 140 °C for iron filings. For the storage cooking period, the erythritol storage pot can boil water. In contrast, the iron filings storage pot shows ineffective heat transfer, achieving a maximum temperature of only about 70 °C. For the simultaneous heating and storage test, the iron filings pot shows higher temperatures during the solar cooking period and much lower temperatures during the storage cooking period than the erythritol pot.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1500/1/012004
Primary Topic
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental comparison of heat storage pots containing powdered iron filings and erythritol using parabolic dish solar cookers

Ashmore Mawire
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
article

Experimental comparison of heat storage pots containing powdered iron filings and erythritol using parabolic dish solar cookers

Ashmore Mawire
article en

Abstract

Abstract Solar cookers cannot be used without heat storage during cloudy periods or at night. Heat storage can be used for cooking during cloudy periods and at night. Two storage cooking pots are thus experimentally evaluated to compare their heat storage performances. A latent heat storage material (erythritol) is compared with a sensible heat storage material (powdered iron filings) during solar cooking periods using parabolic dish solar cookers and during storage cooking periods using wonderbag insulating solar cookers. The powdered iron filings storage pot shows a faster temperature rise during the no-load test, attaining a maximum pot temperature above 200 °C compared to 190 °C for the erythritol due to the higher thermal conductivity of iron filings. However, the storage temperature for erythritol at the end of the no-load lest is around 180 °C compared to 140 °C for iron filings. For the storage cooking period, the erythritol storage pot can boil water. In contrast, the iron filings storage pot shows ineffective heat transfer, achieving a maximum temperature of only about 70 °C. For the simultaneous heating and storage test, the iron filings pot shows higher temperatures during the solar cooking period and much lower temperatures during the storage cooking period than the erythritol pot.

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceVol. 1500(1)
North-West University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.