Teachers’ and Pupils’ Assessment on Learning Styles and Reading Performance

This study was undertaken to determine the correlation and differences between teachers’ assessment and pupils’ perception on learning styles such as visual, auditory, solitary, kinesthetic, logical, verbal, and social, and their impact on reading performance. The study was conducted to forty-four (44) Grades 4 to 6 teachers and two hundred twenty-nine (229) Grade 6 pupils as actual respondents from Manolo Fortich District, Division of Bukidnon. The study employed a descriptive correlational and causal research designs with content analysis, which included a quantitative approach in collecting numerical data through a questionnaire. Mean and Standard Deviation, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient, T-test, and Multiple Linear Regression Analysis were utilized to examine the variables. Results revealed that pupils’ learning style as assessed by teachers and perceived by pupils’ is high. Pupils' reading performance is at the Instructional level. Learning styles are significantly correlated to learners’ reading performance. Significant differences are observed between teachers’ and pupils’ perceptions on their learning styles. Visual and auditory learning styles are significant predictors of reading performance. This means pupils’ reading performance is influenced by their learning styles. Thus, teachers may employ instructional strategies aligned with the pupils’ learning styles to effectively improve reading literacy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v8-i05-80
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teachers’ and Pupils’ Assessment on Learning Styles and Reading Performance

Anna Marie C. Lagat
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
article

Teachers’ and Pupils’ Assessment on Learning Styles and Reading Performance

Anna Marie C. Lagat
article en

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine the correlation and differences between teachers’ assessment and pupils’ perception on learning styles such as visual, auditory, solitary, kinesthetic, logical, verbal, and social, and their impact on reading performance. The study was conducted to forty-four (44) Grades 4 to 6 teachers and two hundred twenty-nine (229) Grade 6 pupils as actual respondents from Manolo Fortich District, Division of Bukidnon. The study employed a descriptive correlational and causal research designs with content analysis, which included a quantitative approach in collecting numerical data through a questionnaire. Mean and Standard Deviation, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient, T-test, and Multiple Linear Regression Analysis were utilized to examine the variables. Results revealed that pupils’ learning style as assessed by teachers and perceived by pupils’ is high. Pupils' reading performance is at the Instructional level. Learning styles are significantly correlated to learners’ reading performance. Significant differences are observed between teachers’ and pupils’ perceptions on their learning styles. Visual and auditory learning styles are significant predictors of reading performance. This means pupils’ reading performance is influenced by their learning styles. Thus, teachers may employ instructional strategies aligned with the pupils’ learning styles to effectively improve reading literacy.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSISVol. 08(05)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.