Dostoevsky’s “Demons” in Chinese: Translation of the Title in the Axiological Aspect

he article reveals the fundamental features of the axiological content of F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel “Demons” as represented in five of its translations into Chinese. They reflect a controversial interpretation of important aspects of the Russian writer’s work, which is confirmed by the diversity of literary interpretations and translations. Due to the fact that the title of the novel “Demons” is a symbolic metaphor, Chinese translators translate it in different ways, including synonyms: demon, devil, Satan, devil, etc. A comparative analysis of the meanings of these words revealed fundamentally significant semantic nuances. The following Chinese translation options are considered: “Devils,” “Demons,” “Demon-possessed people,” “Cherti,” “Besy.” In general, there is a polyvariance of the translation of the keyword in the novel “Demons.” The analysis shows that the hieroglyph (“魔” devil), borrowed from Buddhism, corresponds to its religious context to the greatest extent, in contrast to the hieroglyph (“鬼” devil), which has a pronounced folklore and mythological character. The choice of the lexeme “魔” (demon) with the addition of the hieroglyph “群” (group), which allows to convey the meaning of plurality, is the most accurate and preserves the symbolic meaning of the word “demons,” which appears not only in the title, but also in the epigraphs and in the text of the novel.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ПРОБЛЕМЫ ИСТОРИЧЕСКОЙ ПОЭТИКИ
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15393/j9.art.2025.15042
Primary Topic
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dostoevsky’s “Demons” in Chinese: Translation of the Title in the Axiological Aspect

Валентина Борисова, Yue Li
ПРОБЛЕМЫ ИСТОРИЧЕСКОЙ ПОЭТИКИ
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
article

Dostoevsky’s “Demons” in Chinese: Translation of the Title in the Axiological Aspect

Валентина Борисова, Yue Li
article en

Abstract

he article reveals the fundamental features of the axiological content of F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel “Demons” as represented in five of its translations into Chinese. They reflect a controversial interpretation of important aspects of the Russian writer’s work, which is confirmed by the diversity of literary interpretations and translations. Due to the fact that the title of the novel “Demons” is a symbolic metaphor, Chinese translators translate it in different ways, including synonyms: demon, devil, Satan, devil, etc. A comparative analysis of the meanings of these words revealed fundamentally significant semantic nuances. The following Chinese translation options are considered: “Devils,” “Demons,” “Demon-possessed people,” “Cherti,” “Besy.” In general, there is a polyvariance of the translation of the keyword in the novel “Demons.” The analysis shows that the hieroglyph (“魔” devil), borrowed from Buddhism, corresponds to its religious context to the greatest extent, in contrast to the hieroglyph (“鬼” devil), which has a pronounced folklore and mythological character. The choice of the lexeme “魔” (demon) with the addition of the hieroglyph “群” (group), which allows to convey the meaning of plurality, is the most accurate and preserves the symbolic meaning of the word “demons,” which appears not only in the title, but also in the epigraphs and in the text of the novel.

ПРОБЛЕМЫ ИСТОРИЧЕСКОЙ ПОЭТИКИVol. 23(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.