Social well-being among rural county fair attendees: Results from a pilot study.

This paper reports on results from a pilot study to assess the feasibility of surveying rural county fair attendees about their social well-being. We collected survey data from attendees at two Midwestern rural county fairs in the summer of 2022 (n=56). The survey included questions on loneliness, social isolation, and social engagement, as well as demographic and health characteristics. We analyzed overall rates of social well-being, as well as differences by age, among respondents from rural areas. Respondents scored 4.8 (out of 9.0) on the UCLA Loneliness Scale, below the threshold for being classified as lonely. Respondents scored 17.2 (out of 30.0) on the Lubben Social Network Scale and identified various forms of social support. The highest rates of loneliness and smallest social networks were observed among younger adults (ages 18-34; n=12), while the best social well-being was among older adults (age 65+; n=9). The most common place for respondents to socialize was a restaurant/coffee shop (60% weekly or more often), followed by private homes (31-38% weekly or more often across own or others' homes). Respondents indicated a variety of barriers to social engagement, such as work schedules for younger adults and transportation for older adults. This survey instrument was successful at illuminating various dimensions of social well-being and engagement among rural residents. The social health of younger adults in rural areas needs more attention, including addressing barriers related to work schedules and financial resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rural Mental Health
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/rmh0000294
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social well-being among rural county fair attendees: Results from a pilot study.

Carrie Henning‐Smith, Mary Anne Powell, Laura Farlow
1 links
Rural Mental Health
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

Social well-being among rural county fair attendees: Results from a pilot study.

Carrie Henning‐Smith, Mary Anne Powell, Laura Farlow
article en

Abstract

This paper reports on results from a pilot study to assess the feasibility of surveying rural county fair attendees about their social well-being. We collected survey data from attendees at two Midwestern rural county fairs in the summer of 2022 (n=56). The survey included questions on loneliness, social isolation, and social engagement, as well as demographic and health characteristics. We analyzed overall rates of social well-being, as well as differences by age, among respondents from rural areas. Respondents scored 4.8 (out of 9.0) on the UCLA Loneliness Scale, below the threshold for being classified as lonely. Respondents scored 17.2 (out of 30.0) on the Lubben Social Network Scale and identified various forms of social support. The highest rates of loneliness and smallest social networks were observed among younger adults (ages 18-34; n=12), while the best social well-being was among older adults (age 65+; n=9). The most common place for respondents to socialize was a restaurant/coffee shop (60% weekly or more often), followed by private homes (31-38% weekly or more often across own or others' homes). Respondents indicated a variety of barriers to social engagement, such as work schedules for younger adults and transportation for older adults. This survey instrument was successful at illuminating various dimensions of social well-being and engagement among rural residents. The social health of younger adults in rural areas needs more attention, including addressing barriers related to work schedules and financial resources.

Rural Mental HealthVol. 49(2)
University of Minnesota (US), Minnesota Department of Health (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.