From “Unruly” to “Peaceful and Law-Abiding:” Writing Punishment in Afghanistan, 1901–1919

This essay examines the views of British officials and Afghan intellectuals between 1901 and 1919, a period when the Afghan state significantly reduced corporal punishments. British agents and officers criticized these reductions, arguing that the Afghan population was trapped in an earlier stage of history that required harsh physical penalties. Believing in a linear progression of history with Britain at the forefront and Afghanistan bringing up the rear as a “semi-savage” nation, they insisted that physical punishment was essential for molding Afghans into law-abiding citizens. In contrast, Afghan intellectuals praised their government’s reductions in corporal punishment, viewing them as a return to normality after two decades (1880–1901) of unusually harsh penal laws. While Afghan intellectuals also held that their country trailed the West in education, science, and technology, they viewed history as a complex process in which all peoples, including Afghans, could rapidly develop and come to play equally dynamic roles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Afghanistan
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/afg.2025.0156
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From “Unruly” to “Peaceful and Law-Abiding:” Writing Punishment in Afghanistan, 1901–1919

Sabauon Nasseri
Afghanistan
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

From “Unruly” to “Peaceful and Law-Abiding:” Writing Punishment in Afghanistan, 1901–1919

Sabauon Nasseri
article en

Abstract

This essay examines the views of British officials and Afghan intellectuals between 1901 and 1919, a period when the Afghan state significantly reduced corporal punishments. British agents and officers criticized these reductions, arguing that the Afghan population was trapped in an earlier stage of history that required harsh physical penalties. Believing in a linear progression of history with Britain at the forefront and Afghanistan bringing up the rear as a “semi-savage” nation, they insisted that physical punishment was essential for molding Afghans into law-abiding citizens. In contrast, Afghan intellectuals praised their government’s reductions in corporal punishment, viewing them as a return to normality after two decades (1880–1901) of unusually harsh penal laws. While Afghan intellectuals also held that their country trailed the West in education, science, and technology, they viewed history as a complex process in which all peoples, including Afghans, could rapidly develop and come to play equally dynamic roles.

AfghanistanVol. 8(1)
Beloit College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.