Field testing of azolla Azolla filiculoides and Amaranthus spinosus Kolitis leaf meal for improved tilapia in pond culture

Thisrnstudy evaluated Azolla filiculoides and Amaranthus spinosus leafrnmeal as an alternative diet for Nile tilapia. Fish were fed commercial feedsrn(Control), alongside formulated 20% Azolla (A20) and 50% ASLM (ASLM50) proteinrnsources on alternate days. Resultsrnshowed that growth parameters, final weight, weight gain, specific growth rate,rnfeed conversion ratio, and percentage survival were comparable among allrntreatments. Costrnand return analysis showed that both A20 and ASLM50 had higher net income,rnreturn on investment, and shorter payback periods than that of Control. ASLMrnhad the highest ROI (59.63%) and shortest payback period (1.68 years), closelyrnfollowed by A20, while Control had the lowest. Overall,rnthe incorporation of A20 or ASLM50 in Nile tilapia diets enhanced growthrnperformance and increased profitability, supporting their use as sustainablernand cost-effective alternatives to conventional commercial feeds.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22271/fish.2025.v13.i3c.3093
Primary Topic
Biological Control of Invasive Species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field testing of azolla Azolla filiculoides and Amaranthus spinosus Kolitis leaf meal for improved tilapia in pond culture

Laila M. Gallego, M.M. Guerrero, Isagani P Angeles, Mary Joy L Asprec et al.
International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies
Biological Control of Invasive Species
article

Field testing of azolla Azolla filiculoides and Amaranthus spinosus Kolitis leaf meal for improved tilapia in pond culture

Laila M. Gallego, M.M. Guerrero, Isagani P Angeles, Mary Joy L Asprec, Marites R Castro, Adelaida T. Calpe
article en

Abstract

Thisrnstudy evaluated Azolla filiculoides and Amaranthus spinosus leafrnmeal as an alternative diet for Nile tilapia. Fish were fed commercial feedsrn(Control), alongside formulated 20% Azolla (A20) and 50% ASLM (ASLM50) proteinrnsources on alternate days. Resultsrnshowed that growth parameters, final weight, weight gain, specific growth rate,rnfeed conversion ratio, and percentage survival were comparable among allrntreatments. Costrnand return analysis showed that both A20 and ASLM50 had higher net income,rnreturn on investment, and shorter payback periods than that of Control. ASLMrnhad the highest ROI (59.63%) and shortest payback period (1.68 years), closelyrnfollowed by A20, while Control had the lowest. Overall,rnthe incorporation of A20 or ASLM50 in Nile tilapia diets enhanced growthrnperformance and increased profitability, supporting their use as sustainablernand cost-effective alternatives to conventional commercial feeds.

International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic StudiesVol. 13(3)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Biological Control of Invasive Species
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.