Differences in N fate and net eco-economic value between common urea and humic acid urea: Combined experiments using 15N tracer and field lysimeter

Compared to the limited performance of other high-efficiency urea products, humic acid urea (HAU) increased the grain yield of winter wheat as well as of summer maize. However, the effect of adding different amounts of humic acid (HA) on the fate of urea and comprehensive economic and environmental evaluations remains unclear. Four treatments (no urea (CK), common urea (U), HAU0.5, and HAU5) were compared in a 2-year winter wheat–summer maize rotation system. Compared to U, the grain yield of HAU treatments increased by 4.48–11.25%, regardless of crop type, planting year, or HA addition level; this was partly attributable to the increased storage of soil available N, as confirmed by a simultaneous 15 N tracing microplot experiment in the first winter wheat season. HAU inhibited the loss of reactive N (NH 3 volatilization, N 2 O emission, and NO 3 - -N leaching loss). The C footprint based on the yield and areas calculations for HAUs was 7.01–13.48% and 3.53–5.54% lower than that of U, respectively. Annual environmental damage costs and annual net ecosystem economic benefits were decreased and increased by 14.89%–19.11% and 6.38%–9.23%, respectively. Few agronomic and environmental differences were found between HAU5 and HAU0.5, although the former locked more 15 N nutrients in the topsoil. This combined experiment using 15 N tracer and field lysimeters showed that more nutrients from HAU were absorbed by crops and converted into grains, reducing the environmental risk of greenhouse gas emissions due to the release of unused nutrients from common U into farmland. • Adding HA to urea improved net eco-economic value, verifying that HAU is a green, high-efficiency fertilizer. • The 15 N traced urea residue in the soil were improved and maintained until harvest time. • Footprints of carbon and nitrogen were reduced by 7.01%–13.48% and 21.38%–30.62%. • Ten-fold addition of HA in urea did not result in a greater increase in environmental benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2025.104316
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in N fate and net eco-economic value between common urea and humic acid urea: Combined experiments using 15N tracer and field lysimeter

Shuiqin Zhang, Bingqiang Zhao, Jiukai Xu, Min Liu et al.
1 citations
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
1.72
article

Differences in N fate and net eco-economic value between common urea and humic acid urea: Combined experiments using 15N tracer and field lysimeter

Shuiqin Zhang, Bingqiang Zhao, Jiukai Xu, Min Liu, Yanting Li, Meng Xu, Liang Yuan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Compared to the limited performance of other high-efficiency urea products, humic acid urea (HAU) increased the grain yield of winter wheat as well as of summer maize. However, the effect of adding different amounts of humic acid (HA) on the fate of urea and comprehensive economic and environmental evaluations remains unclear. Four treatments (no urea (CK), common urea (U), HAU0.5, and HAU5) were compared in a 2-year winter wheat–summer maize rotation system. Compared to U, the grain yield of HAU treatments increased by 4.48–11.25%, regardless of crop type, planting year, or HA addition level; this was partly attributable to the increased storage of soil available N, as confirmed by a simultaneous 15 N tracing microplot experiment in the first winter wheat season. HAU inhibited the loss of reactive N (NH 3 volatilization, N 2 O emission, and NO 3 - -N leaching loss). The C footprint based on the yield and areas calculations for HAUs was 7.01–13.48% and 3.53–5.54% lower than that of U, respectively. Annual environmental damage costs and annual net ecosystem economic benefits were decreased and increased by 14.89%–19.11% and 6.38%–9.23%, respectively. Few agronomic and environmental differences were found between HAU5 and HAU0.5, although the former locked more 15 N nutrients in the topsoil. This combined experiment using 15 N tracer and field lysimeters showed that more nutrients from HAU were absorbed by crops and converted into grains, reducing the environmental risk of greenhouse gas emissions due to the release of unused nutrients from common U into farmland. • Adding HA to urea improved net eco-economic value, verifying that HAU is a green, high-efficiency fertilizer. • The 15 N traced urea residue in the soil were improved and maintained until harvest time. • Footprints of carbon and nitrogen were reduced by 7.01%–13.48% and 21.38%–30.62%. • Ten-fold addition of HA in urea did not result in a greater increase in environmental benefits.

Environmental Technology & InnovationVol. 39
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Agricultural Research System, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.