Cognitive Biases:

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, while advancing software development, are often susceptible to cognitive biases that lead to unfair outcomes. This study explores the roles of confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and automation bias in influencing AI decision-making. These biases commonly emerge from unrepresentative datasets, algorithmic design flaws, and subjective human decisions. Through a qualitative methodology involving literature review and case analysis, the research identifies the origins and manifestations of cognitive bias in AI, particularly within domains like criminal justice, healthcare, and recruitment. The study proposes several mitigation strategies: incorporating diverse and representative data, adopting fairness-aware algorithm designs, and conducting routine bias audits. Evaluation criteria include each strategy’s effectiveness, feasibility, transparency, and scalability. Findings indicate that while these techniques significantly improve fairness in AI outputs, they also present practical challenges such as reduced model precision and resource constraints. The study emphasizes that eliminating cognitive bias requires not only technical adjustments but also interdisciplinary collaboration and ethical considerations. The findings serve as a guide for developers, stakeholders, and policymakers aiming to design responsible AI systems that uphold transparency, accountability, and social equity across software development environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN 2959-6386 (online)
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60087/jklst.v4.n2.004
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Biases:

Sheriff Adepoju, Mildred Aiwanno-Ose Adepoju
Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN 2959-6386 (online)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Cognitive Biases:

Sheriff Adepoju, Mildred Aiwanno-Ose Adepoju
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, while advancing software development, are often susceptible to cognitive biases that lead to unfair outcomes. This study explores the roles of confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and automation bias in influencing AI decision-making. These biases commonly emerge from unrepresentative datasets, algorithmic design flaws, and subjective human decisions. Through a qualitative methodology involving literature review and case analysis, the research identifies the origins and manifestations of cognitive bias in AI, particularly within domains like criminal justice, healthcare, and recruitment. The study proposes several mitigation strategies: incorporating diverse and representative data, adopting fairness-aware algorithm designs, and conducting routine bias audits. Evaluation criteria include each strategy’s effectiveness, feasibility, transparency, and scalability. Findings indicate that while these techniques significantly improve fairness in AI outputs, they also present practical challenges such as reduced model precision and resource constraints. The study emphasizes that eliminating cognitive bias requires not only technical adjustments but also interdisciplinary collaboration and ethical considerations. The findings serve as a guide for developers, stakeholders, and policymakers aiming to design responsible AI systems that uphold transparency, accountability, and social equity across software development environments.

Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN 2959-6386 (online)Vol. 4(2)
Prairie View A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.