Re-thinking international human rights law’s approach to identity in light of surveillance and AI

ABSTRACT As AI adoption increases, surveillance-related chilling effects are likely to impair individuals’ ability to freely develop their identities. This article examines International Human Rights Law’s (IHRL) approach to the protection of identity to assess its preparedness against this challenge. It determines that while identity is a central concept in IHRL, no clear and unified approach to the protection of what we term ‘identity as a whole’ exists. In response, this article argues that IHRL must evolve to protect the overall ecosystem of events, interactions, and chance that are central to identity formation. This re-conceptualisation of identity poses two challenges to IHRL. First, as protection of ‘identity as a whole’ requires simultaneous protection of all its features, analysis of harm cannot be adequately conducted using the traditional right-by-right approach. Second, protecting the social processes that identity formation depends upon requires IHRL to expand its scope beyond the individual and individual rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Rights Law Review
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaf016
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-thinking international human rights law’s approach to identity in light of surveillance and AI

Daragh Murray, Ronit Matar
Human Rights Law Review
International Law and Human Rights
article

Re-thinking international human rights law’s approach to identity in light of surveillance and AI

Daragh Murray, Ronit Matar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT As AI adoption increases, surveillance-related chilling effects are likely to impair individuals’ ability to freely develop their identities. This article examines International Human Rights Law’s (IHRL) approach to the protection of identity to assess its preparedness against this challenge. It determines that while identity is a central concept in IHRL, no clear and unified approach to the protection of what we term ‘identity as a whole’ exists. In response, this article argues that IHRL must evolve to protect the overall ecosystem of events, interactions, and chance that are central to identity formation. This re-conceptualisation of identity poses two challenges to IHRL. First, as protection of ‘identity as a whole’ requires simultaneous protection of all its features, analysis of harm cannot be adequately conducted using the traditional right-by-right approach. Second, protecting the social processes that identity formation depends upon requires IHRL to expand its scope beyond the individual and individual rights.

Human Rights Law ReviewVol. 25(3)
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.