Perbandingan Metode Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) dan Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) pada Peramalan Peredaran Uang Kartal di Indonesia

<p>Money is generally accepted as legal tender in fulfilling an obligation. Money circulation is very important to be considered and controlled, to have a positive impact on the economy. Control of money circulation is usually emphasized on the type of cash, which is in the form of paper and metals. One of the ways that can help in controlling cash is by forecasting. This study aims to compare the accuracy of forecasting results on cash circulation data using the SARIMA and ELM methods. The data used is the circulation cash from January 2011 to April 2022. The SARIMA method is a method for forecasting time series data containing seasonality, while the ELM method is a method on artificial neural networks that can do forecasting. The best SARIMA model obtained is SARIMA (1,1,0)(0,1,0)12. The best ELM architecture obtains 12 input layer neurons, 45 hidden layer neurons, and 1 output layer. The measure of forecasting error to determine the best model is using MAPE. The results show that the SARIMA method has a training data MAPE of 2,3270% and testing data of 2,2772%, while the ELM method has a training data MAPE of 4,2548% and testing data of 3,8615%. Therefore, the SARIMA method is better than the ELM method at forecasting the circulation of cash in Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: cash; extreme learning machine; seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: .75pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-para-margin-top: 0in; mso-para-margin-right: .07gd; mso-para-margin-bottom: 0in; mso-para-margin-left: 0in; line-height: normal;"> </p><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="left"><tbody><tr><td> </td><td><img src="file:///C:/Users/lenovo/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image001.gif" alt="" width="579" height="1" /></td></tr></tbody></table><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: .75pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0in; mso-para-margin-top: 0in; mso-para-margin-right: .07gd; mso-para-margin-bottom: 0in; mso-para-margin-left: 0in; line-height: normal;"><!--[endif]--><em></em></p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Applied Statistics
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13057/ijas.v7i2.83128
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and ELM
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perbandingan Metode Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) dan Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) pada Peramalan Peredaran Uang Kartal di Indonesia

Etik Zukhronah, İsnandar Slamet, Afita Ulya Pratiwi
Indonesian Journal of Applied Statistics
Machine Learning and ELM
article

Perbandingan Metode Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) dan Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) pada Peramalan Peredaran Uang Kartal di Indonesia

Etik Zukhronah, İsnandar Slamet, Afita Ulya Pratiwi
article en

Abstract

<p>Money is generally accepted as legal tender in fulfilling an obligation. Money circulation is very important to be considered and controlled, to have a positive impact on the economy. Control of money circulation is usually emphasized on the type of cash, which is in the form of paper and metals. One of the ways that can help in controlling cash is by forecasting. This study aims to compare the accuracy of forecasting results on cash circulation data using the SARIMA and ELM methods. The data used is the circulation cash from January 2011 to April 2022. The SARIMA method is a method for forecasting time series data containing seasonality, while the ELM method is a method on artificial neural networks that can do forecasting. The best SARIMA model obtained is SARIMA (1,1,0)(0,1,0)12. The best ELM architecture obtains 12 input layer neurons, 45 hidden layer neurons, and 1 output layer. The measure of forecasting error to determine the best model is using MAPE. The results show that the SARIMA method has a training data MAPE of 2,3270% and testing data of 2,2772%, while the ELM method has a training data MAPE of 4,2548% and testing data of 3,8615%. Therefore, the SARIMA method is better than the ELM method at forecasting the circulation of cash in Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: cash; extreme learning machine; seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: .75pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-para-margin-top: 0in; mso-para-margin-right: .07gd; mso-para-margin-bottom: 0in; mso-para-margin-left: 0in; line-height: normal;"> </p><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="left"><tbody><tr><td> </td><td><img src="file:///C:/Users/lenovo/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image001.gif" alt="" width="579" height="1" /></td></tr></tbody></table><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: .75pt; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0in; mso-para-margin-top: 0in; mso-para-margin-right: .07gd; mso-para-margin-bottom: 0in; mso-para-margin-left: 0in; line-height: normal;"><!--[endif]--><em></em></p>

Indonesian Journal of Applied StatisticsVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Machine Learning and ELM
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.