Perbandingan Sensitivitas Metode SAW, MAUT dan WSM pada Anugerah Mutu Non-Akademik Universitas

Decision Support System works best with suitable method. Unfortunately, not all methods are equally used. Two rarely used methods are MAUT and WSM methods. To find out whether a method is more suitable for a case than another method is to do a sensitivity test. By doing sensitivity tests between the two methods and other methods such as the commonly used SAW in the same case, it’s possible to find out the comparison of sensitivity percentages between the three. One case that can be helped by a Decision Support System using the three methods is ANOMIK assessment at universities. The three methods produced the same best alternative, namely Faculty 9. After doing a sensitivity test, the results showed that WSM method was the most sensitive with a value of 4.954%, followed by SAW method with a value of 4.901% and finally MAUT method with 3.844%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JISKA (Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga)
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14421/jiska.2025.10.2.207-220
Primary Topic
Management and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perbandingan Sensitivitas Metode SAW, MAUT dan WSM pada Anugerah Mutu Non-Akademik Universitas

Muhammad Galih Wonoseto, Muhammad Abu Shaker Hunaif
JISKA (Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga)
Management and Optimization Techniques
article

Perbandingan Sensitivitas Metode SAW, MAUT dan WSM pada Anugerah Mutu Non-Akademik Universitas

Muhammad Galih Wonoseto, Muhammad Abu Shaker Hunaif
article en

Abstract

Decision Support System works best with suitable method. Unfortunately, not all methods are equally used. Two rarely used methods are MAUT and WSM methods. To find out whether a method is more suitable for a case than another method is to do a sensitivity test. By doing sensitivity tests between the two methods and other methods such as the commonly used SAW in the same case, it’s possible to find out the comparison of sensitivity percentages between the three. One case that can be helped by a Decision Support System using the three methods is ANOMIK assessment at universities. The three methods produced the same best alternative, namely Faculty 9. After doing a sensitivity test, the results showed that WSM method was the most sensitive with a value of 4.954%, followed by SAW method with a value of 4.901% and finally MAUT method with 3.844%.

JISKA (Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga)Vol. 10(2)
Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Management and Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perbandingan Sensitivitas Metode SAW, MAUT dan WSM pada Anugerah Mutu Non-Akademik Universitas — Muhammad Galih Wonoseto, Muhammad Abu Shaker Hunaif · JISKA (Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS