An Archimedean Point for Dating the Gospels

Abstract Based on new arguments for a pre-66 CE dating of John’s Gospel, this article argues that John’s early date and Luke’s late date (between 93/94 and 130 CE ) establish the direction of dependency in the special, verbatim Johannine–Lukan parallels which have long been recognized. It shows how these parallels are part and parcel of John’s argument, and how and why Luke made use of them. This also raises the question of how Matthew and Mark fit within this new chronological framework. The article suggests that Matthew’s “thunderbolt from the Johannine sky” is indeed derived from John, together with John’s narration of Jesus’ post-resurrection appearance to Mary Magdalene. Mark’s Gospel, however, seems to have been written around the same time as John’s Gospel, so that Mark was not familiar with John. Another implication of this rearrangement is that the presumption of the source Q is no longer necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Novum Testamentum
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685365-bja10101
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Archimedean Point for Dating the Gospels

George van Kooten
Novum Testamentum
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

An Archimedean Point for Dating the Gospels

George van Kooten
article en

Abstract

Abstract Based on new arguments for a pre-66 CE dating of John’s Gospel, this article argues that John’s early date and Luke’s late date (between 93/94 and 130 CE ) establish the direction of dependency in the special, verbatim Johannine–Lukan parallels which have long been recognized. It shows how these parallels are part and parcel of John’s argument, and how and why Luke made use of them. This also raises the question of how Matthew and Mark fit within this new chronological framework. The article suggests that Matthew’s “thunderbolt from the Johannine sky” is indeed derived from John, together with John’s narration of Jesus’ post-resurrection appearance to Mary Magdalene. Mark’s Gospel, however, seems to have been written around the same time as John’s Gospel, so that Mark was not familiar with John. Another implication of this rearrangement is that the presumption of the source Q is no longer necessary.

Novum TestamentumVol. 67(3)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.