High performance, large chemical coverage or both: DanishQSAR and hierarchies of post-hoc ensemble models optimized for sensitivity, specificity or balanced accuracy

The trade-off between applicability domain size and prediction accuracy is a well-known phenomenon in QSAR. We have developed a modelling approach where multiple models with different applicability domain sizes and with different prediction accuracy are selected instead of a single best model. This approach is implemented in DanishQSAR, a new software for binary classification QSAR modelling, integrating descriptor calculation, descriptor selection, model development, validation and application. The various methods and options available in the software are automatically tested and efficiently combined during model development using a version of cross-validation-based grid search and post-hoc ensemble modelling. The resulting large and diverse pool of model candidates is then analysed to generate three hierarchies of models, optimized for sensitivity, specificity or balanced accuracy, respectively, for minimum to maximum coverage levels. When predicting a query compound, the system provides predictions from all models in the three hierarchies, at all coverage levels with user-defined steps, together with the individual model predictivity performances, producing a prediction profile rather than one prediction from a single model. Twenty data sets from the Danish (Q)SAR Database (https://qsar.food.dtu.dk) are used to demonstrate the performance. The developed binary classification models are highly accurate by cross- and external validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAR and QSAR in environmental research
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936x.2025.2510964
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High performance, large chemical coverage or both: DanishQSAR and hierarchies of post-hoc ensemble models optimized for sensitivity, specificity or balanced accuracy

Eva Bay Wedebye, Nikolai Georgiev Nikolov
2 citations
SAR and QSAR in environmental research
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
3.01
article

High performance, large chemical coverage or both: DanishQSAR and hierarchies of post-hoc ensemble models optimized for sensitivity, specificity or balanced accuracy

Eva Bay Wedebye, Nikolai Georgiev Nikolov
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The trade-off between applicability domain size and prediction accuracy is a well-known phenomenon in QSAR. We have developed a modelling approach where multiple models with different applicability domain sizes and with different prediction accuracy are selected instead of a single best model. This approach is implemented in DanishQSAR, a new software for binary classification QSAR modelling, integrating descriptor calculation, descriptor selection, model development, validation and application. The various methods and options available in the software are automatically tested and efficiently combined during model development using a version of cross-validation-based grid search and post-hoc ensemble modelling. The resulting large and diverse pool of model candidates is then analysed to generate three hierarchies of models, optimized for sensitivity, specificity or balanced accuracy, respectively, for minimum to maximum coverage levels. When predicting a query compound, the system provides predictions from all models in the three hierarchies, at all coverage levels with user-defined steps, together with the individual model predictivity performances, producing a prediction profile rather than one prediction from a single model. Twenty data sets from the Danish (Q)SAR Database (https://qsar.food.dtu.dk) are used to demonstrate the performance. The developed binary classification models are highly accurate by cross- and external validation.

SAR and QSAR in environmental researchVol. 36(5)
Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
3.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.