Framework contract: mechanism and legal nature of incorporating general terms into individual contracts

The article analyses a common type of framework contracts, in which general parameters of future transactions are agreed upon, while their essential terms are left open for further negotiations. The main question is whether such framework contracts have their own legal effect and, if so, what kind of legal effect they have. The author argues that although positive theories often turn out to be unsound, the idea that the agreement in question is completely devoid of legal force cannot be accepted either, as it does not explain its effect enshrined in Clause 2 of Article 429.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation i. e. the formation of a common set of dispositive terms included in local contracts by default. The reason for the described difficulty, as it is argued in the article, is that the standard conceptual apparatus of civil law is not able to adequately describe the essence of the studied agreement. An appeal to the theory of fact-states and a preliminary explanation of the mechanics of the framework contract's action allow to give the phenomenon a proper explanation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gaps in Russian legislation
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33693/2072-3164-2025-18-1-93-100
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framework contract: mechanism and legal nature of incorporating general terms into individual contracts

Arthur А. Khuzziatov
Gaps in Russian legislation
European and International Contract Law
article

Framework contract: mechanism and legal nature of incorporating general terms into individual contracts

Arthur А. Khuzziatov
article en

Abstract

The article analyses a common type of framework contracts, in which general parameters of future transactions are agreed upon, while their essential terms are left open for further negotiations. The main question is whether such framework contracts have their own legal effect and, if so, what kind of legal effect they have. The author argues that although positive theories often turn out to be unsound, the idea that the agreement in question is completely devoid of legal force cannot be accepted either, as it does not explain its effect enshrined in Clause 2 of Article 429.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation i. e. the formation of a common set of dispositive terms included in local contracts by default. The reason for the described difficulty, as it is argued in the article, is that the standard conceptual apparatus of civil law is not able to adequately describe the essence of the studied agreement. An appeal to the theory of fact-states and a preliminary explanation of the mechanics of the framework contract's action allow to give the phenomenon a proper explanation.

Gaps in Russian legislationVol. 18(1)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
European and International Contract Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.