On the Issue of overcoming gaps in the criminal procedure legislation in the conduct of investigative and other procedural actions

In the article, the author highlights a number of gaps existing in the current criminal procedure legislation in the legal regulation of the production of certain investigative and other procedural actions, in particular, the problem of the procedural registration of the seizure of objects and documents at the stage of pre-investigation inspection; the problem of using explanations received at the stage of pre-investigation inspection as evidence; the problem of the absence of a deadline for the execution of the investigator's instructions on conducting operational search activities; the problem of using the results of operational search activities in proving; the problem of the dispositive nature of the rule on the introduction by the investigator of the idea of eliminating the circumstances contributing to the commission of a crime. Taking into account the different positions of criminologists, as well as the analysis of law enforcement practice, their own ways of solving these problems are proposed, in particular, it is proposed to amend Part 1 of art. 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in terms of instructions to draw up a protocol for the seizure of objects and documents when they are seized in accordance with the requirements of art. 164, 166 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation with presentation to a person, 21 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and sending to this person a copy of the protocol of seizure; in Part 1 of Article 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, it is proposed to fix the provision on the impossibility of using the explanations of persons obtained during the pre-investigation check as evidence; in paragraph 4 of Part 2 of Article 38 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, it is proposed to set a deadline for execution instructions from the investigator to carry out operational search activities within 10 days from the date of receipt of the order, as well as to consolidate the obligation of the bodies or officials carrying out the investigator's instructions, if there are grounds, to inform him in advance about the progress of the execution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gaps in Russian legislation
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33693/2072-3164-2025-18-1-109-117
Primary Topic
Education, Law, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Issue of overcoming gaps in the criminal procedure legislation in the conduct of investigative and other procedural actions

V.N. Isaenko, Maxim Grigoriev
Gaps in Russian legislation
Education, Law, and Society
article

On the Issue of overcoming gaps in the criminal procedure legislation in the conduct of investigative and other procedural actions

V.N. Isaenko, Maxim Grigoriev
article en

Abstract

In the article, the author highlights a number of gaps existing in the current criminal procedure legislation in the legal regulation of the production of certain investigative and other procedural actions, in particular, the problem of the procedural registration of the seizure of objects and documents at the stage of pre-investigation inspection; the problem of using explanations received at the stage of pre-investigation inspection as evidence; the problem of the absence of a deadline for the execution of the investigator's instructions on conducting operational search activities; the problem of using the results of operational search activities in proving; the problem of the dispositive nature of the rule on the introduction by the investigator of the idea of eliminating the circumstances contributing to the commission of a crime. Taking into account the different positions of criminologists, as well as the analysis of law enforcement practice, their own ways of solving these problems are proposed, in particular, it is proposed to amend Part 1 of art. 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in terms of instructions to draw up a protocol for the seizure of objects and documents when they are seized in accordance with the requirements of art. 164, 166 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation with presentation to a person, 21 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and sending to this person a copy of the protocol of seizure; in Part 1 of Article 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, it is proposed to fix the provision on the impossibility of using the explanations of persons obtained during the pre-investigation check as evidence; in paragraph 4 of Part 2 of Article 38 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, it is proposed to set a deadline for execution instructions from the investigator to carry out operational search activities within 10 days from the date of receipt of the order, as well as to consolidate the obligation of the bodies or officials carrying out the investigator's instructions, if there are grounds, to inform him in advance about the progress of the execution.

Gaps in Russian legislationVol. 18(1)
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Education, Law, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.