Indonesia's Humanitarian Diplomacy in the Midst of Gaza and Ukraine Crises: Narratives, Challenges, and Soft Power Potentials

The global humanitarian crises in Gaza and Ukraine have become a test for the diplomatic position of developing countries in the international system. Indonesia, as a country with a strong identity in international solidarity and the principle of free and active foreign policy, plays an interesting role in navigating humanitarian diplomacy. Indonesia's involvement in the Gaza issue shows a commitment based on humanitarian solidarity, while its approach to Ukraine is more neutral and strategic. This context is important to analyze to see the potential of Indonesia's soft power as a moral actor at the global level. This study aims to evaluate the practice of Indonesia's humanitarian diplomacy in two contemporary conflict terrains-Gaza and Ukraine-by examining the narratives built, implementation challenges, and the extent to which it strengthens Indonesia's position in international diplomacy. The approach used is qualitative-descriptive with methods of diplomatic discourse analysis, document study, and observation of government statements, media, and relevant international cooperation. The results show that although Indonesia is consistent in promoting humanitarian and justice values, there are limitations in logistical capabilities, diplomatic access, and direct influence on conflict actors. However, the narratives built in humanitarian diplomacy have increased positive perceptions of Indonesia in the Global South, and opened strategic space in the utilization of soft power in the future, especially in the multilateral realm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59261/jpia.v2i1.6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indonesia's Humanitarian Diplomacy in the Midst of Gaza and Ukraine Crises: Narratives, Challenges, and Soft Power Potentials

Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
1 citations
Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
4.20
article

Indonesia's Humanitarian Diplomacy in the Midst of Gaza and Ukraine Crises: Narratives, Challenges, and Soft Power Potentials

Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The global humanitarian crises in Gaza and Ukraine have become a test for the diplomatic position of developing countries in the international system. Indonesia, as a country with a strong identity in international solidarity and the principle of free and active foreign policy, plays an interesting role in navigating humanitarian diplomacy. Indonesia's involvement in the Gaza issue shows a commitment based on humanitarian solidarity, while its approach to Ukraine is more neutral and strategic. This context is important to analyze to see the potential of Indonesia's soft power as a moral actor at the global level. This study aims to evaluate the practice of Indonesia's humanitarian diplomacy in two contemporary conflict terrains-Gaza and Ukraine-by examining the narratives built, implementation challenges, and the extent to which it strengthens Indonesia's position in international diplomacy. The approach used is qualitative-descriptive with methods of diplomatic discourse analysis, document study, and observation of government statements, media, and relevant international cooperation. The results show that although Indonesia is consistent in promoting humanitarian and justice values, there are limitations in logistical capabilities, diplomatic access, and direct influence on conflict actors. However, the narratives built in humanitarian diplomacy have increased positive perceptions of Indonesia in the Global South, and opened strategic space in the utilization of soft power in the future, especially in the multilateral realm.

Journal of Political Innovation and AnalysisVol. 2(1)
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.