Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods

Credit card fraud has become a significant concern in the digital era, driven by the rise in online transactions and the sophistication of fraudulent activities. Traditional fraud detection systems are increasingly inadequate due to their static nature and limited adaptability to new attack patterns. In response, this study presents a comparative analysis of recent machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques used for credit card fraud detection (CCFD). A total of 29 peer-reviewed studies published between 2019 and 2024 were reviewed, covering a range of ML models such as Decision Trees, Random Forest, XGBoost, and ensemble methods, alongside DL models including CNNs, LSTMs, AutoEncoders, and Graph Neural Networks. The analysis focuses on performance metrics, dataset characteristics, model limitations, and the effectiveness of imbalance handling strategies. Findings reveal that while DL models often achieve higher accuracy, they demand more computational resources, whereas ML models offer better efficiency and interpretability. The study concludes with a discussion on key challenges and suggests future research directions, including hybrid model development, improved imbalance handling, and real-time system deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering and Technology Journal
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47191/etj/v10i05.45
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods

Omar Sedqi Kareem, Yasser F. Hassan
Engineering and Technology Journal
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
article

Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods

Omar Sedqi Kareem, Yasser F. Hassan
article en

Abstract

Credit card fraud has become a significant concern in the digital era, driven by the rise in online transactions and the sophistication of fraudulent activities. Traditional fraud detection systems are increasingly inadequate due to their static nature and limited adaptability to new attack patterns. In response, this study presents a comparative analysis of recent machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques used for credit card fraud detection (CCFD). A total of 29 peer-reviewed studies published between 2019 and 2024 were reviewed, covering a range of ML models such as Decision Trees, Random Forest, XGBoost, and ensemble methods, alongside DL models including CNNs, LSTMs, AutoEncoders, and Graph Neural Networks. The analysis focuses on performance metrics, dataset characteristics, model limitations, and the effectiveness of imbalance handling strategies. Findings reveal that while DL models often achieve higher accuracy, they demand more computational resources, whereas ML models offer better efficiency and interpretability. The study concludes with a discussion on key challenges and suggests future research directions, including hybrid model development, improved imbalance handling, and real-time system deployment.

Engineering and Technology JournalVol. 10(05)
Chengdu University of Information Technology (CN), Duhok Polytechnic University (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.