Evaluation Value of Cervical Bishop Score and Cervical Elastography Ultrasound Parameters in Assessing Cervical Ripeness

Background: The use of transvaginal ultrasound to measure several parameters has been investigated as an alternative to the cervical Bishop score to predict the success rate of induced labor. We analyzed the utility of the cervical Bishop score and cervical elastography ultrasound parameters in assessing cervical ripeness after 39 weeks gestation. Methods: This retrospective case-control study reviewed 230 pregnant women who underwent labor induction and delivered at the Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, from May 2022 to November 2023. Cervical Bishop scores and cervical elastography ultrasound parameters were measured prior to labor induction. According to the labor outcomes, participants were categorized into a successful induction group (n = 220) and a failed induction group (n = 10). We compared the differences between the two groups and analyzed the predictive value of the cervical Bishop score and cervical elastography ultrasound parameters for assessing cervical ripeness using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The cervical bishop score in the failed induction group was significantly lower than in the successful induction group (p < 0.05), and the height was also significantly lower in the failed induction group compared to the successful induction group (p = 0.047). No statistically significant differences were found in basic characteristics such as cervical length, cervical hardness, shape of the cervical internal os, cervical transverse width, and internal/external os (IOS/EOS) ratio (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the predictive value of the cervical Bishop score and cervical elastography ultrasound parameters for assessing cervical ripeness, with ROC curve areas of 0.706 and 0.710, respectively. Conclusions: The cervical Bishop score and cervical elastography ultrasound parameters demonstrated equivalent effectiveness in evaluating cervical ripeness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/ceog36788
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation Value of Cervical Bishop Score and Cervical Elastography Ultrasound Parameters in Assessing Cervical Ripeness

Shuting Bao, Jie Wen, Mengkai Du, Yicheng Qi
1 citations
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
2.01
article

Evaluation Value of Cervical Bishop Score and Cervical Elastography Ultrasound Parameters in Assessing Cervical Ripeness

Shuting Bao, Jie Wen, Mengkai Du, Yicheng Qi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: The use of transvaginal ultrasound to measure several parameters has been investigated as an alternative to the cervical Bishop score to predict the success rate of induced labor. We analyzed the utility of the cervical Bishop score and cervical elastography ultrasound parameters in assessing cervical ripeness after 39 weeks gestation. Methods: This retrospective case-control study reviewed 230 pregnant women who underwent labor induction and delivered at the Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, from May 2022 to November 2023. Cervical Bishop scores and cervical elastography ultrasound parameters were measured prior to labor induction. According to the labor outcomes, participants were categorized into a successful induction group (n = 220) and a failed induction group (n = 10). We compared the differences between the two groups and analyzed the predictive value of the cervical Bishop score and cervical elastography ultrasound parameters for assessing cervical ripeness using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The cervical bishop score in the failed induction group was significantly lower than in the successful induction group (p < 0.05), and the height was also significantly lower in the failed induction group compared to the successful induction group (p = 0.047). No statistically significant differences were found in basic characteristics such as cervical length, cervical hardness, shape of the cervical internal os, cervical transverse width, and internal/external os (IOS/EOS) ratio (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the predictive value of the cervical Bishop score and cervical elastography ultrasound parameters for assessing cervical ripeness, with ROC curve areas of 0.706 and 0.710, respectively. Conclusions: The cervical Bishop score and cervical elastography ultrasound parameters demonstrated equivalent effectiveness in evaluating cervical ripeness.

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & GynecologyVol. 52(5)
Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.