Empirical Analysis of Driver Behavior at Uncontrolled Midblock Crosswalks: Influence of Bike Lane Buffer Types

Abstract At unsignalized midblock crosswalks (UMCs), visual obstructions created by bike lane buffers can substantially affect drivers’ pedestrian detection and yielding behavior. However, limited evidence is available regarding how different types of bike lane buffers influence driving performance through changes in visual attention and cognitive workload. To address this issue, four representative bike lane buffer scenarios—Lawn, Railing, Bush, and Tree—were developed in a driving simulation environment. Vehicle operation parameters and eye-tracking data were collected simultaneously to investigate drivers’ behavioral and visual responses while approaching a crosswalk. The results showed that highly obstructive buffers significantly delayed pedestrian detection and weakened drivers’ early risk perception. In the Bush and Tree scenarios, pedestrians were detected at distances of only about 18 m from the crosswalk, representing a reduction of more than 40% compared with the low-obstruction conditions. As a consequence, drivers exhibited lower terminal braking speeds, higher maximum deceleration rates, and more abrupt braking maneuvers. The mean braking initiation distance in the Bush and Tree scenarios was approximately 48 m, which was more than 10 m shorter than that observed under the Lawn and Railing conditions. Eye-tracking analyses further revealed that highly obstructive environments significantly increased fixation duration on roadside areas while reducing the effective visual search range. In addition, the proportions of saccades and blinks decreased to approximately 3%, whereas the coefficient of variation of pupil diameter increased to 0.23, indicating elevated cognitive workload and mental stress. These findings demonstrate that visual obstructions associated with bike lane buffers can adversely affect drivers’ hazard perception, visual search behavior, and braking responses. The study provides empirical evidence to support the safety evaluation and design optimization of bike lane buffers near unsignalized midblock crosswalks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.teeng-10087
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Empirical Analysis of Driver Behavior at Uncontrolled Midblock Crosswalks: Influence of Bike Lane Buffer Types

Jiaxu Liu, Rui Tian, Baojie Wang
1 links
Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Empirical Analysis of Driver Behavior at Uncontrolled Midblock Crosswalks: Influence of Bike Lane Buffer Types

Jiaxu Liu, Rui Tian, Baojie Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract At unsignalized midblock crosswalks (UMCs), visual obstructions created by bike lane buffers can substantially affect drivers’ pedestrian detection and yielding behavior. However, limited evidence is available regarding how different types of bike lane buffers influence driving performance through changes in visual attention and cognitive workload. To address this issue, four representative bike lane buffer scenarios—Lawn, Railing, Bush, and Tree—were developed in a driving simulation environment. Vehicle operation parameters and eye-tracking data were collected simultaneously to investigate drivers’ behavioral and visual responses while approaching a crosswalk. The results showed that highly obstructive buffers significantly delayed pedestrian detection and weakened drivers’ early risk perception. In the Bush and Tree scenarios, pedestrians were detected at distances of only about 18 m from the crosswalk, representing a reduction of more than 40% compared with the low-obstruction conditions. As a consequence, drivers exhibited lower terminal braking speeds, higher maximum deceleration rates, and more abrupt braking maneuvers. The mean braking initiation distance in the Bush and Tree scenarios was approximately 48 m, which was more than 10 m shorter than that observed under the Lawn and Railing conditions. Eye-tracking analyses further revealed that highly obstructive environments significantly increased fixation duration on roadside areas while reducing the effective visual search range. In addition, the proportions of saccades and blinks decreased to approximately 3%, whereas the coefficient of variation of pupil diameter increased to 0.23, indicating elevated cognitive workload and mental stress. These findings demonstrate that visual obstructions associated with bike lane buffers can adversely affect drivers’ hazard perception, visual search behavior, and braking responses. The study provides empirical evidence to support the safety evaluation and design optimization of bike lane buffers near unsignalized midblock crosswalks.

Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A SystemsVol. 153(1)
Sustainable cities and communities
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon