Kajian Literatur Perbandingan Teknik Kecerdasan Komputasional : Jaringan Syaraf Tiruan Vs. Algoritma Evolusioner

The rapid development in the field of Computational Intelligence (CI) has driven the use of various techniques to solve complex problems. Two main approaches that are often compared within CI are Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Evolutionary Algorithms (EA), each with its own strengths and limitations. Artificial Neural Networks, inspired by the structure of the human brain, operate through interconnected layers of neurons and have proven effective in pattern recognition and non-linear data modeling. Meanwhile, Evolutionary Algorithms, inspired by the process of biological evolution, are used for global solution searches in complex optimization problems without requiring mathematical derivatives of the objective function. In this study, we compare these two techniques based on architecture, model complexity, performance, and their applications across various domains. Additionally, we explore the potential of integrating both techniques into a hybrid approach that can optimize performance on more complex problems. The findings of this study indicate that combining ANN and EA, such as in neuroevolution approaches, provides more adaptive and efficient solutions compared to using each technique independently. This study offers insights into the use of ANN and EA and their applications in image processing, industrial optimization, and data-driven intelligent systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mutiara Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59059/mutiara.v3i3.2366
Primary Topic
Computer Science and Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kajian Literatur Perbandingan Teknik Kecerdasan Komputasional : Jaringan Syaraf Tiruan Vs. Algoritma Evolusioner

Rizkie Maulana, Nurdin Nurdin
Mutiara Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
Computer Science and Engineering
article

Kajian Literatur Perbandingan Teknik Kecerdasan Komputasional : Jaringan Syaraf Tiruan Vs. Algoritma Evolusioner

Rizkie Maulana, Nurdin Nurdin
article en

Abstract

The rapid development in the field of Computational Intelligence (CI) has driven the use of various techniques to solve complex problems. Two main approaches that are often compared within CI are Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Evolutionary Algorithms (EA), each with its own strengths and limitations. Artificial Neural Networks, inspired by the structure of the human brain, operate through interconnected layers of neurons and have proven effective in pattern recognition and non-linear data modeling. Meanwhile, Evolutionary Algorithms, inspired by the process of biological evolution, are used for global solution searches in complex optimization problems without requiring mathematical derivatives of the objective function. In this study, we compare these two techniques based on architecture, model complexity, performance, and their applications across various domains. Additionally, we explore the potential of integrating both techniques into a hybrid approach that can optimize performance on more complex problems. The findings of this study indicate that combining ANN and EA, such as in neuroevolution approaches, provides more adaptive and efficient solutions compared to using each technique independently. This study offers insights into the use of ANN and EA and their applications in image processing, industrial optimization, and data-driven intelligent systems.

Mutiara Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya IlmiahVol. 3(3)
Malikussaleh University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Computer Science and Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.