SETTLEMENT OF CRIMINAL CASES BY CONSULTATION IN THE CRIMINAL ACT OF THEFT IN THE FAMILY IN SEUNAGAN DISTRICT, NAGAN RAYA REGENCY

The resolution of minor criminal acts that occur in Indonesian society can usually be achieved through several channels, one of which is through deliberation. The concept of deliberation itself is regulated in Aceh Qanun Number 9 of 2008 concerning the Development of Customary Life and Customs. So that the formulation of the problem in this study is how effective and constraining the resolution of cases through deliberation in the crime of theft in. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and constraints in resolving cases through deliberation in the crime of theft in the family. The method used is empirical juridical with a statutory approach and a case approach.The results of the study found that deliberation in the crime of theft in the family tends to be effective to be carried out because of the issue of morality and values that are still upheld. And the constraints in resolving cases through deliberation in the family are related to personal relationships between the parties who are families who tend to be more sensitive to being accessed by third parties in their resolution, so a persuasive approach is needed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ius Civile Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v9i1.11745
Primary Topic
Legal and Social Justice Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SETTLEMENT OF CRIMINAL CASES BY CONSULTATION IN THE CRIMINAL ACT OF THEFT IN THE FAMILY IN SEUNAGAN DISTRICT, NAGAN RAYA REGENCY

Jalaluddin Jalaluddin, Aditya Abdi Pratama, Yurma Nurila
Ius Civile Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan
Legal and Social Justice Studies
article

SETTLEMENT OF CRIMINAL CASES BY CONSULTATION IN THE CRIMINAL ACT OF THEFT IN THE FAMILY IN SEUNAGAN DISTRICT, NAGAN RAYA REGENCY

Jalaluddin Jalaluddin, Aditya Abdi Pratama, Yurma Nurila
article en

Abstract

The resolution of minor criminal acts that occur in Indonesian society can usually be achieved through several channels, one of which is through deliberation. The concept of deliberation itself is regulated in Aceh Qanun Number 9 of 2008 concerning the Development of Customary Life and Customs. So that the formulation of the problem in this study is how effective and constraining the resolution of cases through deliberation in the crime of theft in. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and constraints in resolving cases through deliberation in the crime of theft in the family. The method used is empirical juridical with a statutory approach and a case approach.The results of the study found that deliberation in the crime of theft in the family tends to be effective to be carried out because of the issue of morality and values that are still upheld. And the constraints in resolving cases through deliberation in the family are related to personal relationships between the parties who are families who tend to be more sensitive to being accessed by third parties in their resolution, so a persuasive approach is needed.

Ius Civile Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan KeadilanVol. 9(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Legal and Social Justice Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.