Student Perceptions of Live Versus Recorded Presentations

This quantitative case study investigates student perceptions of live and recorded presentations in the Korean EFL classroom. The study surveyed 161 university students about the differences in their attitudes related to anxiety, time investment, use of technology, fairness in grading, and ease of cheating between live and recorded presentations. The survey instrument consisted of 16 Likert-type prompts which were split into three sections: perceptions of video presentations, perceptions of live audience presentations, and a comparison between the two modes. The perceptions were compared using the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test and corroborated with the direct comparison survey items. It was found that there was a significant preference for video presentations related to anxiety, time investment, and use of technology. There was no significant difference in the student attitudes related to the fairness of grading between the two modes of presenting. Finally, students believed that it was less likely there would be cheating in live presentations compared to recorded presentations. The results from the study indicate that both live audience and recorded presentations should be used in the EFL classroom because they have complementary strengths and weaknesses. These different modes of presentation help students develop the necessary skills required for the modern workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
STEM Journal
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16875/stem.2025.26.2.28
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student Perceptions of Live Versus Recorded Presentations

Charles S. Copeland, Natalie Hallemans
2 citations
STEM Journal
Online and Blended Learning
17.85
article

Student Perceptions of Live Versus Recorded Presentations

Charles S. Copeland, Natalie Hallemans
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This quantitative case study investigates student perceptions of live and recorded presentations in the Korean EFL classroom. The study surveyed 161 university students about the differences in their attitudes related to anxiety, time investment, use of technology, fairness in grading, and ease of cheating between live and recorded presentations. The survey instrument consisted of 16 Likert-type prompts which were split into three sections: perceptions of video presentations, perceptions of live audience presentations, and a comparison between the two modes. The perceptions were compared using the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test and corroborated with the direct comparison survey items. It was found that there was a significant preference for video presentations related to anxiety, time investment, and use of technology. There was no significant difference in the student attitudes related to the fairness of grading between the two modes of presenting. Finally, students believed that it was less likely there would be cheating in live presentations compared to recorded presentations. The results from the study indicate that both live audience and recorded presentations should be used in the EFL classroom because they have complementary strengths and weaknesses. These different modes of presentation help students develop the necessary skills required for the modern workforce.

STEM JournalVol. 26(2)
Dankook University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Online and Blended Learning
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Student Perceptions of Live Versus Recorded Presentations — Charles S. Copeland, Natalie Hallemans · STEM Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS