Responsibility dynamics in open science: exploring researchers’ framing of ethical considerations in policy implementation

Abstract This study explores the responsibility framings researchers adopt when implementing Open Science (OS) policies, focusing on how responsibility dynamics are integrated into research practice. Three key responsibility framings emerged: internal orientation to responsibility (individual ethics), external orientation to socially/societally responsible science (social and societal ethics), and external orientation to shared, collective responsibility (collective ethics). These framings influence OS policy implementation, highlighting researchers’ roles in navigating ethical challenges and shaping OS practices. The first framing emphasizes personal ethics and reflection on OS policies, the second stresses the societal impact of research, and the third underscores the need for collective governance. This study contributes to understanding responsibility in science by presenting a dynamic, proactive view of responsibility, where researchers actively engage, challenge, and shape policies. It offers policy recommendations for adaptive OS frameworks, critical reflection on ethical challenges, and inclusive governance involving diverse stakeholders to foster responsible Open Science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Public Policy
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaf021
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responsibility dynamics in open science: exploring researchers’ framing of ethical considerations in policy implementation

Erika Lilja
Science and Public Policy
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Responsibility dynamics in open science: exploring researchers’ framing of ethical considerations in policy implementation

Erika Lilja
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study explores the responsibility framings researchers adopt when implementing Open Science (OS) policies, focusing on how responsibility dynamics are integrated into research practice. Three key responsibility framings emerged: internal orientation to responsibility (individual ethics), external orientation to socially/societally responsible science (social and societal ethics), and external orientation to shared, collective responsibility (collective ethics). These framings influence OS policy implementation, highlighting researchers’ roles in navigating ethical challenges and shaping OS practices. The first framing emphasizes personal ethics and reflection on OS policies, the second stresses the societal impact of research, and the third underscores the need for collective governance. This study contributes to understanding responsibility in science by presenting a dynamic, proactive view of responsibility, where researchers actively engage, challenge, and shape policies. It offers policy recommendations for adaptive OS frameworks, critical reflection on ethical challenges, and inclusive governance involving diverse stakeholders to foster responsible Open Science.

Science and Public PolicyVol. 52(6)
Tampere University (FI)
Pirkanmaan Rahasto
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.