Awareness of Grammatical Variability in Language Contact: The Case of Mano and Kpelle in Guinea

ABSTRACT This paper contributes to research on the awareness of grammatical variability through a study of variation in reflexivity marking in Mano under the influence of Kpelle, both indigenous languages of Guinea. The speakers of these languages are found to be sensitive to contact‐induced grammatical variation in reflexivity, which manifests via variation in comprehension patterns and, more specifically, in form‐to‐meaning correspondence, across different communities. We explain the patterns by hypothesizing that variation in comprehension is at least partially based on language experience in a particular environment and does not necessarily reflect a difference in grammatical representation. Such explanation underscores the importance of sociolinguistic considerations for employing acceptability judgments in syntactic analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sociolinguistics
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12705
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Awareness of Grammatical Variability in Language Contact: The Case of Mano and Kpelle in Guinea

Maria Khachaturyan, George Moroz, Pé Mamy
2 citations
Journal of Sociolinguistics
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
6.13
article

Awareness of Grammatical Variability in Language Contact: The Case of Mano and Kpelle in Guinea

Maria Khachaturyan, George Moroz, Pé Mamy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper contributes to research on the awareness of grammatical variability through a study of variation in reflexivity marking in Mano under the influence of Kpelle, both indigenous languages of Guinea. The speakers of these languages are found to be sensitive to contact‐induced grammatical variation in reflexivity, which manifests via variation in comprehension patterns and, more specifically, in form‐to‐meaning correspondence, across different communities. We explain the patterns by hypothesizing that variation in comprehension is at least partially based on language experience in a particular environment and does not necessarily reflect a difference in grammatical representation. Such explanation underscores the importance of sociolinguistic considerations for employing acceptability judgments in syntactic analysis.

Journal of SociolinguisticsVol. 29(4)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), University of the Arts Helsinki (FI)
Helsingin Yliopisto, Koneen Säätiö, National Research University Higher School of Economics
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
6.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Awareness of Grammatical Variability in Language Contact: The Case of Mano and Kpelle in Guinea — Maria Khachaturyan, George Moroz, et al. · Journal of Sociolinguistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS