Study on Energy Evolution Law of Rocks With Different Lithologies and Sizes

ABSTRACT Investigating the actual patterns of energy accumulation and release in roof rock, particularly with varying stiffnesses in mining environments, is crucial. By conducting cyclic loading and unloading tests on rock samples of different lithologies, different sizes, and consistent stiffness, how lithology, size, and stiffness affect the evolution and distribution of rock energy were explored. Furthermore, the practical applications of stiffness theory in engineering contexts were discussed. This paper finds that, for samples of the same size but different lithologies, in loading, the rate of elastic energy growth accelerates with load and decreases with stiffness, whereas the peak proportion of elastic energy rises with stiffness. In unloading, lower stiffness leads to higher, prolonged elastic energy release. For samples of the same lithology but varying sizes, energy growth increases as stiffness decreases, with minimal peak proportion of elastic energy variation. In unloading, lower stiffness leads to higher, prolonged elastic energy release. Among samples with identical stiffness but different lithologies and sizes, little difference is seen in loading energy growth or unloading release rates, but elastic energy proportion varies mainly due to lithology. Higher Young's modulus and larger sizes result in greater elastic energy storage. Lab tests show that low‐stiffness machines will cause dynamic damage to the coal specimen, whereas hard rocks are more prone to coal bursts due to higher energy storage and release compared to soft rocks. The main reason for the deviation between the two is that the energy storage capacity of hard rock is greater than that of soft rock, and the storage‐release elastic energy of hard rock is greater than that of soft rock.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Science & Engineering
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70166
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on Energy Evolution Law of Rocks With Different Lithologies and Sizes

Yanchun Yin, Shudong He, Zhihao Gao, Guoying Li et al.
Energy Science & Engineering
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Study on Energy Evolution Law of Rocks With Different Lithologies and Sizes

Yanchun Yin, Shudong He, Zhihao Gao, Guoying Li, Liyuan Liu, Zhao Zhi-gang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Investigating the actual patterns of energy accumulation and release in roof rock, particularly with varying stiffnesses in mining environments, is crucial. By conducting cyclic loading and unloading tests on rock samples of different lithologies, different sizes, and consistent stiffness, how lithology, size, and stiffness affect the evolution and distribution of rock energy were explored. Furthermore, the practical applications of stiffness theory in engineering contexts were discussed. This paper finds that, for samples of the same size but different lithologies, in loading, the rate of elastic energy growth accelerates with load and decreases with stiffness, whereas the peak proportion of elastic energy rises with stiffness. In unloading, lower stiffness leads to higher, prolonged elastic energy release. For samples of the same lithology but varying sizes, energy growth increases as stiffness decreases, with minimal peak proportion of elastic energy variation. In unloading, lower stiffness leads to higher, prolonged elastic energy release. Among samples with identical stiffness but different lithologies and sizes, little difference is seen in loading energy growth or unloading release rates, but elastic energy proportion varies mainly due to lithology. Higher Young's modulus and larger sizes result in greater elastic energy storage. Lab tests show that low‐stiffness machines will cause dynamic damage to the coal specimen, whereas hard rocks are more prone to coal bursts due to higher energy storage and release compared to soft rocks. The main reason for the deviation between the two is that the energy storage capacity of hard rock is greater than that of soft rock, and the storage‐release elastic energy of hard rock is greater than that of soft rock.

Energy Science & EngineeringVol. 13(8)
Shandong Lianxing Energy Group (China) (CN), China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Corp (China) (CN), Shandong University of Science and Technology (CN), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.