How Can Teams Benefit From AI Team Members? Exploring the Effect of Generative AI on Decision‐Making Processes and Decision Quality in Team–AI Collaboration

ABSTRACT Human teams with distributed knowledge can make high‐quality decisions but often fail due to decision‐making asymmetries. As AI team members become integrated collaborators, understanding how AI can reduce these decision‐making asymmetries is essential. However, little is known about how AI team members can reduce these asymmetries and whether new AI‐specific asymmetries emerge from team–AI collaboration. Building on the information asymmetries model, we conducted an exploratory experiment with 215 individuals across 81 teams performing a hidden profile task under three knowledge configurations: (1) human teams with asymmetric knowledge, (2) teams collaborating with AI with centralized knowledge, and (3) teams collaborating with AI with asymmetric knowledge. Our results show that teams with centralized AI knowledge make more accurate decisions than human teams due to reduced decision‐making asymmetries, trust in AI, beneficial AI information processing, and a balanced AI collaboration focus. In contrast, teams with asymmetric AI knowledge show only moderate reductions in decision‐making asymmetries. Moreover, due to emerging AI‐specific asymmetries—such as mistrust, nonbeneficial AI information processing, and a critical AI collaboration focus—these teams fail to outperform human teams. We integrated our findings into process models that illustrate how successful team–AI collaboration depends on effective teamwork between human and AI members.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2898
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Can Teams Benefit From AI Team Members? Exploring the Effect of Generative AI on Decision‐Making Processes and Decision Quality in Team–AI Collaboration

Armin Heinzl, Ekaterina Jussupow, Ivo Benke, Désirée Zercher
8 citations
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Team Dynamics and Performance
19.51
article

How Can Teams Benefit From AI Team Members? Exploring the Effect of Generative AI on Decision‐Making Processes and Decision Quality in Team–AI Collaboration

Armin Heinzl, Ekaterina Jussupow, Ivo Benke, Désirée Zercher
article en
8 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Human teams with distributed knowledge can make high‐quality decisions but often fail due to decision‐making asymmetries. As AI team members become integrated collaborators, understanding how AI can reduce these decision‐making asymmetries is essential. However, little is known about how AI team members can reduce these asymmetries and whether new AI‐specific asymmetries emerge from team–AI collaboration. Building on the information asymmetries model, we conducted an exploratory experiment with 215 individuals across 81 teams performing a hidden profile task under three knowledge configurations: (1) human teams with asymmetric knowledge, (2) teams collaborating with AI with centralized knowledge, and (3) teams collaborating with AI with asymmetric knowledge. Our results show that teams with centralized AI knowledge make more accurate decisions than human teams due to reduced decision‐making asymmetries, trust in AI, beneficial AI information processing, and a balanced AI collaboration focus. In contrast, teams with asymmetric AI knowledge show only moderate reductions in decision‐making asymmetries. Moreover, due to emerging AI‐specific asymmetries—such as mistrust, nonbeneficial AI information processing, and a critical AI collaboration focus—these teams fail to outperform human teams. We integrated our findings into process models that illustrate how successful team–AI collaboration depends on effective teamwork between human and AI members.

Journal of Organizational Behavior
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), University of Mannheim (DE), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Team Dynamics and Performance
19.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.