Spectral and Textural Features for Predicting Soil Phosphorus Using Vis‐NIR Point Data and Multispectral UAV Imagery: A Case Study From a Long‐Term Experiment

ABSTRACT Background Soil nutrient status assessment is a key aspect of crop management. Unlike the labor‐ and time‐intensive conventional approach, precision farming techniques are expanding to ensure the uniformity of soil nutrients, enhance production, and alleviate economic pressure. Aims In this study, the potentials of visible and near‐infrared spectroscopy (Vis‐NIRS), as non‐imaging technology and multispectral imagery mounted on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to predict plant‐available (AP) and total phosphorus (TP) (P) were studied and compared. Materials & Methods Soil samples were taken from a long‐term experiment with contrasting fertilization treatments, and their spectra were recorded. Additionally, drone multispectral images were taken before and after soil tillage and seedbed preparation. Results The predicted available P content by Vis‐NIRS was characterized by a cross‐validation determination coefficient of R 2 cv = 0.82 and validation determination coefficient of R 2 v = 0.74, whereas the root mean square error for cross‐validation (RMSE cv ) and validation (RMSE v ) were, respectively, 11.23 and 14.09 mg kg −1 . The random forest (RF) model based on the textural and spectral features from multispectral images taken after seedbed preparation had the highest performances to predict plant‐available P ( R 2 v = 0.68, RMSE v = 13.65 mg kg −1 , and RPIQ v = 2.98), whereas the lowest prediction accuracy was obtained for total P prediction model after seedbed preparation ( R 2 v = 0.40, RMSE v = 67.91, and RPIQ v = 0.6). The effective wavelengths were around 450, 580, and 700 nm for predicting the available P fraction. Before soil tillage, the vegetation indices ranked high in the RF prediction models for available phosphorus (AP) and TP as compared to those developed after using tillage image‐derived indices. In contrast, red‐edge, red, and green bands, in addition to texture indices, were the most important predictors of soil available P following seedbed preparation. Conclusion Our study suggests that soil tillage and seedbed preparation incorporate vegetation cover and alter soil roughness, resulting in a more homogeneous, smoother surface and higher accuracy for soil P prediction using UAV multispectral imagery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.12012
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spectral and Textural Features for Predicting Soil Phosphorus Using Vis‐NIR Point Data and Multispectral UAV Imagery: A Case Study From a Long‐Term Experiment

Jean‐François Bastin, Abdallah Oukarroum, Jeroen Meersmans, Benoît Mercatoris et al.
1 citations
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
0.80
article

Spectral and Textural Features for Predicting Soil Phosphorus Using Vis‐NIR Point Data and Multispectral UAV Imagery: A Case Study From a Long‐Term Experiment

Jean‐François Bastin, Abdallah Oukarroum, Jeroen Meersmans, Benoît Mercatoris, Benjamin Dumont, Vincent Baeten, Yousra El‐Mejjaouy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Soil nutrient status assessment is a key aspect of crop management. Unlike the labor‐ and time‐intensive conventional approach, precision farming techniques are expanding to ensure the uniformity of soil nutrients, enhance production, and alleviate economic pressure. Aims In this study, the potentials of visible and near‐infrared spectroscopy (Vis‐NIRS), as non‐imaging technology and multispectral imagery mounted on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to predict plant‐available (AP) and total phosphorus (TP) (P) were studied and compared. Materials & Methods Soil samples were taken from a long‐term experiment with contrasting fertilization treatments, and their spectra were recorded. Additionally, drone multispectral images were taken before and after soil tillage and seedbed preparation. Results The predicted available P content by Vis‐NIRS was characterized by a cross‐validation determination coefficient of R 2 cv = 0.82 and validation determination coefficient of R 2 v = 0.74, whereas the root mean square error for cross‐validation (RMSE cv ) and validation (RMSE v ) were, respectively, 11.23 and 14.09 mg kg −1 . The random forest (RF) model based on the textural and spectral features from multispectral images taken after seedbed preparation had the highest performances to predict plant‐available P ( R 2 v = 0.68, RMSE v = 13.65 mg kg −1 , and RPIQ v = 2.98), whereas the lowest prediction accuracy was obtained for total P prediction model after seedbed preparation ( R 2 v = 0.40, RMSE v = 67.91, and RPIQ v = 0.6). The effective wavelengths were around 450, 580, and 700 nm for predicting the available P fraction. Before soil tillage, the vegetation indices ranked high in the RF prediction models for available phosphorus (AP) and TP as compared to those developed after using tillage image‐derived indices. In contrast, red‐edge, red, and green bands, in addition to texture indices, were the most important predictors of soil available P following seedbed preparation. Conclusion Our study suggests that soil tillage and seedbed preparation incorporate vegetation cover and alter soil roughness, resulting in a more homogeneous, smoother surface and higher accuracy for soil P prediction using UAV multispectral imagery.

Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil ScienceVol. 188(4)
University of Liège (BE), Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (BE), Walloon Agricultural Research Centre (BE), Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.