The Application of 4E Cognition to Counseling and the Intersectional Experiences of Black Individuals With Disabilities

ABSTRACT Black Americans with disabilities experience a range of inequities including barriers to access, social stigmatization, and health outcomes that are greater than both their White and their nondisabled peers. This conceptual article explains in detail these inequities. The authors provide an overview of the existing models of disability used in counseling, healthcare, research, and educational settings, as well as a rationale for why they are limited. The authors then suggest a 4E cognitive framework rooted in cognitive sciences, philosophy of mind, and neuroscience. The authors explain why a 4E cognitive framework may be better suited than existing models to conceptualize the experiences of Black Americans with disabilities. Finally, the authors provide implications of the usage of this model for counseling, counseling research, and counseling education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12326
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Application of 4E Cognition to Counseling and the Intersectional Experiences of Black Individuals With Disabilities

Jeffry L. Moe, Aaron Albright, Clarence K. Bumpas
1 citations
Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
3.44
article

The Application of 4E Cognition to Counseling and the Intersectional Experiences of Black Individuals With Disabilities

Jeffry L. Moe, Aaron Albright, Clarence K. Bumpas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Black Americans with disabilities experience a range of inequities including barriers to access, social stigmatization, and health outcomes that are greater than both their White and their nondisabled peers. This conceptual article explains in detail these inequities. The authors provide an overview of the existing models of disability used in counseling, healthcare, research, and educational settings, as well as a rationale for why they are limited. The authors then suggest a 4E cognitive framework rooted in cognitive sciences, philosophy of mind, and neuroscience. The authors explain why a 4E cognitive framework may be better suited than existing models to conceptualize the experiences of Black Americans with disabilities. Finally, the authors provide implications of the usage of this model for counseling, counseling research, and counseling education.

Journal of Multicultural Counseling and DevelopmentVol. 53(3)
Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Application of 4E Cognition to Counseling and the Intersectional Experiences of Black Individuals With Disabilities — Jeffry L. Moe, Aaron Albright, et al. · Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS