Scaling Out Community Conservation Initiatives: Experts Identify Economic and Social Benefits, Compatibility With Needs, and External Support as Key

ABSTRACT Community‐based natural resource management is a common strategy for conserving biodiversity, but little is known about how such initiatives can scale appropriately and widely. We interviewed 80 experts across 5 widely adopted community‐based initiatives (in Chile, Nepal, Namibia, Madagascar, and Fiji) to understand their perspectives on the drivers of adoption and spread. We used general elimination methodology and diffusion of innovation theory to identify and rule out possible explanations. Factors consistently considered influential were economic and social benefits, compatibility with needs, support and facilitation by extension agencies, and the presence of international organizations. Initiatives aiming to scale should be designed to be flexible and aligned with adopters’ needs, and external organizations should coordinate resources for scaling out. Dependence on external support underscores the need for quality assistance, good practices by external actors, and understanding power relations and fairness, as well as the need to temper donor and policy expectations of scaling beyond supported and appropriate sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Letters
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.13100
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaling Out Community Conservation Initiatives: Experts Identify Economic and Social Benefits, Compatibility With Needs, and External Support as Key

Marie V. Touchon, Morena Mills, Selma Lendelvo, Alifereti Tawake et al.
4 citations
Conservation Letters
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
19.33
article

Scaling Out Community Conservation Initiatives: Experts Identify Economic and Social Benefits, Compatibility With Needs, and External Support as Key

Marie V. Touchon, Morena Mills, Selma Lendelvo, Alifereti Tawake, Zeeshan Ahmad, Matt Clark, Stefan Gelcich, Arundhati Jagadish, Thomas Pienkowski, Michael B. Mascia, Elizabeth Denis, B. K. Pathak, S. R. Milligan, Solofo Nandrianina Ralaimihoatra, Yasmeen Zuffetti, Zoya Husain, Sushma Shrestha Sangat
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Community‐based natural resource management is a common strategy for conserving biodiversity, but little is known about how such initiatives can scale appropriately and widely. We interviewed 80 experts across 5 widely adopted community‐based initiatives (in Chile, Nepal, Namibia, Madagascar, and Fiji) to understand their perspectives on the drivers of adoption and spread. We used general elimination methodology and diffusion of innovation theory to identify and rule out possible explanations. Factors consistently considered influential were economic and social benefits, compatibility with needs, support and facilitation by extension agencies, and the presence of international organizations. Initiatives aiming to scale should be designed to be flexible and aligned with adopters’ needs, and external organizations should coordinate resources for scaling out. Dependence on external support underscores the need for quality assistance, good practices by external actors, and understanding power relations and fairness, as well as the need to temper donor and policy expectations of scaling beyond supported and appropriate sites.

Conservation LettersVol. 18(3)
Conservation International (US), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Duke University (US), University of Namibia (NA), Center of Applied Ecology & Sustainability (CL), Imperial College London (GB), Fiji National University (FJ), Nature Conservation Foundation (IN)
Margaret A. Cargill Foundation, Cargill Foundation, Leverhulme Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
19.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.