What occupation does <i>not</i> tell about: Measuring status in Ukraine’s capital

This study examines how social status is assessed in contemporary Ukrainian society (on the case of Kyiv city). We expect that social status deviates from traditional occupation-based measures prevalent in Western contexts and is more closely related to material wealth than to occupation. Using a multidimensional framework (Warner’s Status Characteristics Index), we employ a factorial survey experiment to test the importance of four (independent) dimensions for status assessment: occupation, income, area of residence, and housing conditions. The experiment was implemented as an online survey in Kyiv 2023. The results confirm that income is the primary determinant of social status judgment, followed by housing conditions, while occupation and area of residence exert less influence. The criteria for judging social status remain consistent across gender, age, and socio-economic strata. This study contributes to the establishment of a standardized index for measuring social status and highlights the nuances of social stratification in Ukraine. Finally, we critically discuss our findings and the future relevance of occupation as a status marker due to the current war and its aftermath.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Sociology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809251332552
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What occupation does not tell about: Measuring status in Ukraine’s capital

Thomas Hinz, Mykola Sydorov, Yeliena Kovalska
International Sociology
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

What occupation does not tell about: Measuring status in Ukraine’s capital

Thomas Hinz, Mykola Sydorov, Yeliena Kovalska
article en

Abstract

This study examines how social status is assessed in contemporary Ukrainian society (on the case of Kyiv city). We expect that social status deviates from traditional occupation-based measures prevalent in Western contexts and is more closely related to material wealth than to occupation. Using a multidimensional framework (Warner’s Status Characteristics Index), we employ a factorial survey experiment to test the importance of four (independent) dimensions for status assessment: occupation, income, area of residence, and housing conditions. The experiment was implemented as an online survey in Kyiv 2023. The results confirm that income is the primary determinant of social status judgment, followed by housing conditions, while occupation and area of residence exert less influence. The criteria for judging social status remain consistent across gender, age, and socio-economic strata. This study contributes to the establishment of a standardized index for measuring social status and highlights the nuances of social stratification in Ukraine. Finally, we critically discuss our findings and the future relevance of occupation as a status marker due to the current war and its aftermath.

International SociologyVol. 40(3)
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (UA), University of Konstanz (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What occupation does <i>not</i> tell about: Measuring status in Ukraine’s capital — Thomas Hinz, Mykola Sydorov, et al. · International Sociology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS