Replies to Clavel-Vázquez, Gibson, Jollimore and Lamarque

Abstract This is my response to four commentaries from Adriana Clavel-Vázquez, John Gibson, Troy Jollimore and Peter Lamarque on my book Philosophy of Lyric Voice: the cognitive value of page and performance poetry . Here I discuss their criticisms of my account of the lyric in page and performance poetry including the problems of how to connect the embodied performance of poetry with page poetry (Clavel-Vázquez), where to locate expression in the poem and the idea of singing along (Gibson), how poetry is able to express messy and chaotic inner lives through the limitations of language (Jollimore) and finally the relationship between authenticity, embodiment and voice (Lamarque). I am truly grateful to each of the commentators for their thoughtful, generous and insightful comments that have enabled me to deepen and extend my discussion of poetry as perspectival, relational and social and work out some important details that strengthens my account.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophia
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-025-00850-9
Primary Topic
Artistic and Creative Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Replies to Clavel-Vázquez, Gibson, Jollimore and Lamarque

Karen Simecek
Philosophia
Artistic and Creative Research
article

Replies to Clavel-Vázquez, Gibson, Jollimore and Lamarque

Karen Simecek
article en

Abstract

Abstract This is my response to four commentaries from Adriana Clavel-Vázquez, John Gibson, Troy Jollimore and Peter Lamarque on my book Philosophy of Lyric Voice: the cognitive value of page and performance poetry . Here I discuss their criticisms of my account of the lyric in page and performance poetry including the problems of how to connect the embodied performance of poetry with page poetry (Clavel-Vázquez), where to locate expression in the poem and the idea of singing along (Gibson), how poetry is able to express messy and chaotic inner lives through the limitations of language (Jollimore) and finally the relationship between authenticity, embodiment and voice (Lamarque). I am truly grateful to each of the commentators for their thoughtful, generous and insightful comments that have enabled me to deepen and extend my discussion of poetry as perspectival, relational and social and work out some important details that strengthens my account.

PhilosophiaVol. 53(1)
University of Warwick (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Artistic and Creative Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.