Comparison of CT Scan, X-Ray and Ultrasound in Sensitivity and Specificity for Identifying Kidney Stones in Clinical Settings? : A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Introduction: Kidney stones are a prevalent urological condition requiring accurate imaging for diagnosis and management. This study compares the sensitivity and specificity of three primary imaging modalities: computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, and X-ray. Methods: The study followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, reviewing English-language publications from 2015 to 2025. Editorials, duplicate reviews from the same journal, and papers lacking a DOI were excluded. The literature search was conducted using PubMed, SagePub, Semanthic Scholar, and Google Scholar., focusing on studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of CT, ultrasound, and X-ray in detecting kidney stones. Sensitivity and specificity data were extracted and analyzed. Results: Non-contrast CT emerged as the gold standard, demonstrating sensitivity rates between 86% and 98% and specificity approaching 100%. Ultrasound, while radiation-free, showed variable sensitivity (72%-85%) influenced by operator skill. X-ray exhibited moderate sensitivity (~78%) but was limited to detecting radiopaque stones. Combined imaging strategies, such as ultrasound followed by low-dose CT, improved diagnostic accuracy while minimizing radiation exposure. Discussion: The findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate imaging modalities based on patient characteristics and clinical context. While CT offers superior diagnostic performance, ultrasound remains a valuable first-line tool, particularly in vulnerable populations. The integration of emerging technologies and combined imaging approaches may further enhance diagnostic capabilities. Conclusion: This analysis highlights the need for evidence-based imaging strategies in managing kidney stones, emphasizing the balance between diagnostic accuracy and patient safety. Future research should focus on optimizing imaging protocols and validating new technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Indonesian Journal of General Medicine
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70070/z7gnhq90
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of CT Scan, X-Ray and Ultrasound in Sensitivity and Specificity for Identifying Kidney Stones in Clinical Settings? : A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Dovie Yullia Putri, Imam Baharsyah Azri
The Indonesian Journal of General Medicine
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Comparison of CT Scan, X-Ray and Ultrasound in Sensitivity and Specificity for Identifying Kidney Stones in Clinical Settings? : A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Dovie Yullia Putri, Imam Baharsyah Azri
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Kidney stones are a prevalent urological condition requiring accurate imaging for diagnosis and management. This study compares the sensitivity and specificity of three primary imaging modalities: computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, and X-ray. Methods: The study followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, reviewing English-language publications from 2015 to 2025. Editorials, duplicate reviews from the same journal, and papers lacking a DOI were excluded. The literature search was conducted using PubMed, SagePub, Semanthic Scholar, and Google Scholar., focusing on studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of CT, ultrasound, and X-ray in detecting kidney stones. Sensitivity and specificity data were extracted and analyzed. Results: Non-contrast CT emerged as the gold standard, demonstrating sensitivity rates between 86% and 98% and specificity approaching 100%. Ultrasound, while radiation-free, showed variable sensitivity (72%-85%) influenced by operator skill. X-ray exhibited moderate sensitivity (~78%) but was limited to detecting radiopaque stones. Combined imaging strategies, such as ultrasound followed by low-dose CT, improved diagnostic accuracy while minimizing radiation exposure. Discussion: The findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate imaging modalities based on patient characteristics and clinical context. While CT offers superior diagnostic performance, ultrasound remains a valuable first-line tool, particularly in vulnerable populations. The integration of emerging technologies and combined imaging approaches may further enhance diagnostic capabilities. Conclusion: This analysis highlights the need for evidence-based imaging strategies in managing kidney stones, emphasizing the balance between diagnostic accuracy and patient safety. Future research should focus on optimizing imaging protocols and validating new technologies.

The Indonesian Journal of General MedicineVol. 12(1)
Universitas Langlangbuana (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.