Comparison of the Performance of Feed A and Feed B on Productivity and Cost Efficiency at Surodadi Farm, Sleman

This study aims to evaluate the productivity and feed efficiency of laying hens through a comparative analysis of two commercial feed types, Feed A and Feed B. A quantitative approach was employed, utilizing independent samples t-test and Revenue to Cost (R/C) ratio analysis. Sample size was determined using Slovin's formula based on uniform criteria of flock size, age, and cage dimensions, resulting in a minimum requirement of 385 hens. To improve accuracy, 2952 Lohmann Brown hens (35–54 weeks old) were used, distributed equally in two cages of 1476 hens each. Key performance indicators included Hen Day Production (HDP), egg mass (g/hen/week), Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR), and net income. The results showed that Feed B provided better performance across all metrics. HDP for Feed B reached 91.49%, higher than Feed A at 88.75%. Total egg mass produced per cage for Feed B was 1638 kg, exceeding Feed A at 1554 kg. Feed B also recorded a more favorable FCR (2.14 vs. 2.25), indicating more efficient feed utilization. Economically, although Feed B was slightly more expensive (IDR 6,352/kg) than Feed A (IDR 6,268/kg), it generated a higher net income of IDR 6,434,870 for the total flock (2952 hens) over the study period. The R/C ratio for Feed B was 1.21, compared to 1.15 for Feed A, indicating relatively greater profitability. These findings suggest that Feed B is a more efficient and economically advantageous option for commercial layer operations aiming to optimize productivity and returns.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.11061
Primary Topic
Food and Agricultural Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Performance of Feed A and Feed B on Productivity and Cost Efficiency at Surodadi Farm, Sleman

Yeti Lis Purnamadewi, Dahri Tanjung, Adler Haymans Manurung, Warcito Warcito
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA
Food and Agricultural Sciences
article

Comparison of the Performance of Feed A and Feed B on Productivity and Cost Efficiency at Surodadi Farm, Sleman

Yeti Lis Purnamadewi, Dahri Tanjung, Adler Haymans Manurung, Warcito Warcito
article en

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the productivity and feed efficiency of laying hens through a comparative analysis of two commercial feed types, Feed A and Feed B. A quantitative approach was employed, utilizing independent samples t-test and Revenue to Cost (R/C) ratio analysis. Sample size was determined using Slovin's formula based on uniform criteria of flock size, age, and cage dimensions, resulting in a minimum requirement of 385 hens. To improve accuracy, 2952 Lohmann Brown hens (35–54 weeks old) were used, distributed equally in two cages of 1476 hens each. Key performance indicators included Hen Day Production (HDP), egg mass (g/hen/week), Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR), and net income. The results showed that Feed B provided better performance across all metrics. HDP for Feed B reached 91.49%, higher than Feed A at 88.75%. Total egg mass produced per cage for Feed B was 1638 kg, exceeding Feed A at 1554 kg. Feed B also recorded a more favorable FCR (2.14 vs. 2.25), indicating more efficient feed utilization. Economically, although Feed B was slightly more expensive (IDR 6,352/kg) than Feed A (IDR 6,268/kg), it generated a higher net income of IDR 6,434,870 for the total flock (2952 hens) over the study period. The R/C ratio for Feed B was 1.21, compared to 1.15 for Feed A, indicating relatively greater profitability. These findings suggest that Feed B is a more efficient and economically advantageous option for commercial layer operations aiming to optimize productivity and returns.

Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPAVol. 11(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Food and Agricultural Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.