Pandangan Sosiologis Politik terhadap Hak Veto PBB: Penolakan terhadap Gencatan Senjata Permanen dalam Konflik di Gaza

The prolonged conflict in Gaza has raised global concerns, particularly regarding the role of the UN and the use of veto power in addressing the conflict. This article aims to critically examine the use of the UN veto power, especially regarding the rejection of a permanent ceasefire in the Gaza conflict, from sociological view of politics. Using a qualitative approach and analyzing primary and secondary literature, this article highlights the negative implications of the UN veto power and its ethical criticisms in the context of the Gaza conflict. The analysis results show that the Islamic political ethics perspective emphasizes the importance of justice, equality, and recognition of human rights in resolving the conflict. In conclusion, a sustainable solution to the Gaza conflict should involve active participation from the international community, reform of the world security system, and recognition of the basic rights of the Palestinian people.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transgenera Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Politik dan Humaniora
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35457/transgenera.v2i1.4100
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pandangan Sosiologis Politik terhadap Hak Veto PBB: Penolakan terhadap Gencatan Senjata Permanen dalam Konflik di Gaza

Farah Salma Rubbiyanti, Fawwaz As’ad Rizqullah
Transgenera Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Politik dan Humaniora
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

Pandangan Sosiologis Politik terhadap Hak Veto PBB: Penolakan terhadap Gencatan Senjata Permanen dalam Konflik di Gaza

Farah Salma Rubbiyanti, Fawwaz As’ad Rizqullah
article en

Abstract

The prolonged conflict in Gaza has raised global concerns, particularly regarding the role of the UN and the use of veto power in addressing the conflict. This article aims to critically examine the use of the UN veto power, especially regarding the rejection of a permanent ceasefire in the Gaza conflict, from sociological view of politics. Using a qualitative approach and analyzing primary and secondary literature, this article highlights the negative implications of the UN veto power and its ethical criticisms in the context of the Gaza conflict. The analysis results show that the Islamic political ethics perspective emphasizes the importance of justice, equality, and recognition of human rights in resolving the conflict. In conclusion, a sustainable solution to the Gaza conflict should involve active participation from the international community, reform of the world security system, and recognition of the basic rights of the Palestinian people.

Transgenera Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Politik dan HumanioraVol. 2(1)
Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.