Low-Risk High-Reward Transition to Low Pressure Tunnel Transit

Typical low-pressure tunnel transit concepts are based on the low-pressure tunnels as separate transit corridors with the disadvantage of the time and cost associated with passengers transferring to and from transit outside the tunnel infrastructure. A new multimodal ground-effect flight technology (GEFT) identifies a path for seamless connectivity between commuter and intercity rail and highway corridors. This paper considers and evaluates approaches to open-entry tunnel transit with engineering of tailwinds to increase speed and energy efficiency. Digital prototypes were evaluated using computational fluid dynamics with results identifying that as velocity is increased in tunnels, pressure can be designed to decrease at a magnitude equal to the change in air’s dynamic pressure. When considering both tailwind and decreased pressures, the competitive advantage of open-entry lower-pressure tunnel transit extends to distances up to at least 1000 miles. To a first approximation, closed tunnel transit systems are able to achieve lower pressures and advantages at distances over about 2000 miles; however, when considering the opportunity for continuous improvement in the evolutionary path, the emergence of closed systems having advantages at any distance is not certain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering and Technology Journal
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47191/etj/v10i05.28
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-Risk High-Reward Transition to Low Pressure Tunnel Transit

Galen J. Suppes, Adam Suppes
2 citations
Engineering and Technology Journal
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
9.99
article

Low-Risk High-Reward Transition to Low Pressure Tunnel Transit

Galen J. Suppes, Adam Suppes
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Typical low-pressure tunnel transit concepts are based on the low-pressure tunnels as separate transit corridors with the disadvantage of the time and cost associated with passengers transferring to and from transit outside the tunnel infrastructure. A new multimodal ground-effect flight technology (GEFT) identifies a path for seamless connectivity between commuter and intercity rail and highway corridors. This paper considers and evaluates approaches to open-entry tunnel transit with engineering of tailwinds to increase speed and energy efficiency. Digital prototypes were evaluated using computational fluid dynamics with results identifying that as velocity is increased in tunnels, pressure can be designed to decrease at a magnitude equal to the change in air’s dynamic pressure. When considering both tailwind and decreased pressures, the competitive advantage of open-entry lower-pressure tunnel transit extends to distances up to at least 1000 miles. To a first approximation, closed tunnel transit systems are able to achieve lower pressures and advantages at distances over about 2000 miles; however, when considering the opportunity for continuous improvement in the evolutionary path, the emergence of closed systems having advantages at any distance is not certain.

Engineering and Technology JournalVol. 10(05)
Institution of Civil Engineers (GB), Building Research Institute (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
9.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Low-Risk High-Reward Transition to Low Pressure Tunnel Transit — Galen J. Suppes, Adam Suppes · Engineering and Technology Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS