The middling as domain of fugitivity and possibility

The commentaries on my recent article Ant logic and the necrolocutor revealed the extent to which the exceedingly slippery figuration of the necrolocutor – represented as marginal abstraction, colonial subject, exploited labourer, refusal personified, dialogic liberator, prisoner confined by impossibility – has evaded us all as it flickers in and out of view across our combined readings and writings. This response begins by grappling with suggestions of acting and learning from the belows and bottoms of this world and the next. Extending the critiques of these vertical imaginings of power, the response asks what of the unacknowledged middle. The response reflects on the middle as actual, logistical, material possibility space that the top and the bottom, if taken as they are articulated, cannot provide – a flickering domain of fugitivity and possibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues in Human Geography
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206251345565
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The middling as domain of fugitivity and possibility

Lydia Gibson
1 links
Dialogues in Human Geography
Anthropological Studies and Insights
article

The middling as domain of fugitivity and possibility

Lydia Gibson
article en

Abstract

The commentaries on my recent article Ant logic and the necrolocutor revealed the extent to which the exceedingly slippery figuration of the necrolocutor – represented as marginal abstraction, colonial subject, exploited labourer, refusal personified, dialogic liberator, prisoner confined by impossibility – has evaded us all as it flickers in and out of view across our combined readings and writings. This response begins by grappling with suggestions of acting and learning from the belows and bottoms of this world and the next. Extending the critiques of these vertical imaginings of power, the response asks what of the unacknowledged middle. The response reflects on the middle as actual, logistical, material possibility space that the top and the bottom, if taken as they are articulated, cannot provide – a flickering domain of fugitivity and possibility.

Dialogues in Human GeographyVol. 16(1)
Georgetown University (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.