Factors influencing artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in the age of generative AI chatbots for health information seeking

Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy plays a significant role in effectively communicating with AI generative chatbots for seeking health information or advice, as well as communicating with healthcare professionals and public health officials. The study aims to identify the factors influencing AI literacy and its subsequent influence on consumers’ behavioral intentions toward seeking health information using generative AI chatbots. A nine-factor measurement model (INS, ISE, IFO, AIH, ANX, AVD, AIL, BI, AIC) was developed with the help of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and tested using structural equation modeling. The results of SEM analysis demonstrate that IFO (β = 0.138, CR = 2.731, p < .05), ANX (β = 0.175, CR = 3.103, p < .05), and AVD (β = 0.158, CR = 3.855, p < .05) had a statistically positive significant influence on AI literacy. Similarly, BI (β = 0.128, CR = 2.423, p < .05) had a statistically positive significant influence on AIC. A positive but non-significant effect of INS on AIL was also observed (β=0.058, CR = 1.006, p > .05). AIL also had a positive but non-significant effect on BI (β=0.050, CR = 1.598, p > .05). Additionally, the results of model fit indices show adequate model fit values: χ2 = 1.679 DF = 1867; p = .000; IFI = 0.954; TLI = 0.951; CFI = 0.953; RMSEA = 0.031. The findings conclude that information overload, anxiety, and avoidance significantly influence AI literacy. On the other hand, information source exposure, AI hallucination, and information seeking do not significantly influence consumers’ AI literacy level. The study suggests that health professionals and staff could be equipped with better knowledge and skills related to AI applications in healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Development
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251343030
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in the age of generative AI chatbots for health information seeking

Anas Alhur, Ying-Yueh Su, Yang Liu, Salman Bin Naeem
6 citations
Information Development
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
3.93
article

Factors influencing artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in the age of generative AI chatbots for health information seeking

Anas Alhur, Ying-Yueh Su, Yang Liu, Salman Bin Naeem
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy plays a significant role in effectively communicating with AI generative chatbots for seeking health information or advice, as well as communicating with healthcare professionals and public health officials. The study aims to identify the factors influencing AI literacy and its subsequent influence on consumers’ behavioral intentions toward seeking health information using generative AI chatbots. A nine-factor measurement model (INS, ISE, IFO, AIH, ANX, AVD, AIL, BI, AIC) was developed with the help of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and tested using structural equation modeling. The results of SEM analysis demonstrate that IFO (β = 0.138, CR = 2.731, p < .05), ANX (β = 0.175, CR = 3.103, p < .05), and AVD (β = 0.158, CR = 3.855, p < .05) had a statistically positive significant influence on AI literacy. Similarly, BI (β = 0.128, CR = 2.423, p < .05) had a statistically positive significant influence on AIC. A positive but non-significant effect of INS on AIL was also observed (β=0.058, CR = 1.006, p > .05). AIL also had a positive but non-significant effect on BI (β=0.050, CR = 1.598, p > .05). Additionally, the results of model fit indices show adequate model fit values: χ2 = 1.679 DF = 1867; p = .000; IFI = 0.954; TLI = 0.951; CFI = 0.953; RMSEA = 0.031. The findings conclude that information overload, anxiety, and avoidance significantly influence AI literacy. On the other hand, information source exposure, AI hallucination, and information seeking do not significantly influence consumers’ AI literacy level. The study suggests that health professionals and staff could be equipped with better knowledge and skills related to AI applications in healthcare settings.

Information Development
South China Agricultural University (CN), Fu Jen Catholic University (TW), Islamia University of Bahawalpur (PK), University of Ha'il (SA), City University of Macau (MO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
3.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.