Use of local non-preservative agents in the treatment of glaucoma

Relevance Most topical hypotensive agents used to treat glaucoma contain preservatives in varying concentrations [1–3]. With prolonged use of topical therapy, patients with glaucoma may develop dry eye syndrome (DES) or toxic-allergic conjunctivitis of varying severity. Currently, new topical preservative-free agents have been developed to reduce the number of side effects during long-term hypotensive therapy: Brimonidine 0.2% and a fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol [4, 5]. Objective To conduct a comparative analysis of the hypotensive effect and tolerability of topical preservative-free drugs in glaucoma therapy. Material and methods The study was conducted in a group of 60 patients (60 eyes) with drug-induced normalization of intraocular pressure against the background of the use of hypotensive agents. The first group included 30 patients (30 eyes) who underwent replacement of dorzolamide + timolol or brinzolamide + timolol combination with a fixed combination drug without a preservative. The second group also included 30 patients (30 eyes) who underwent replacement of Brimonidine with a preservative-free analogue. Corneal-compensated intraocular pressure was measured before the drug was changed and 1 month after using antihypertensive drugs. Tolerability of the new preservative-free therapy was assessed using a special questionnaire and biomicroscopy of the ocular surface. Results The change of standard local antihypertensive therapy to preservative-free in both groups of patients was accompanied by a decrease in complaints and symptoms characteristic of dry eye syndrome and toxic-allergic conjunctivitis. At the same time, the average total score characterizing drug intolerance, when assessed by the patient, decreased by 2.4 times, and by the attending physician - by 1.9 times. Also in the second group of patients using Brimonidine, a decrease in the level of corneal-compensated intraocular pressure was noted (p < 0.05). In the first group of patients who used a fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol, the level of corneal-compensated intraocular pressure remained unchanged (p > 0.05). Conclusion The use of preservative-free forms of drugs in the treatment of patients with glaucoma is justified both as initial therapy and as a replacement for current therapy. Key words: glaucoma; ophthalmotonus; intraocular pressure; preservative-free therapy

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Modern technologies in ophtalmology
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25276/2312-4911-2025-2-64-65
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of local non-preservative agents in the treatment of glaucoma

A.A. Vitkov, I.V. Kozlova, I.I. Asinovskova, I.A. Kosyan
Modern technologies in ophtalmology
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
article

Use of local non-preservative agents in the treatment of glaucoma

A.A. Vitkov, I.V. Kozlova, I.I. Asinovskova, I.A. Kosyan
article en

Abstract

Relevance Most topical hypotensive agents used to treat glaucoma contain preservatives in varying concentrations [1–3]. With prolonged use of topical therapy, patients with glaucoma may develop dry eye syndrome (DES) or toxic-allergic conjunctivitis of varying severity. Currently, new topical preservative-free agents have been developed to reduce the number of side effects during long-term hypotensive therapy: Brimonidine 0.2% and a fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol [4, 5]. Objective To conduct a comparative analysis of the hypotensive effect and tolerability of topical preservative-free drugs in glaucoma therapy. Material and methods The study was conducted in a group of 60 patients (60 eyes) with drug-induced normalization of intraocular pressure against the background of the use of hypotensive agents. The first group included 30 patients (30 eyes) who underwent replacement of dorzolamide + timolol or brinzolamide + timolol combination with a fixed combination drug without a preservative. The second group also included 30 patients (30 eyes) who underwent replacement of Brimonidine with a preservative-free analogue. Corneal-compensated intraocular pressure was measured before the drug was changed and 1 month after using antihypertensive drugs. Tolerability of the new preservative-free therapy was assessed using a special questionnaire and biomicroscopy of the ocular surface. Results The change of standard local antihypertensive therapy to preservative-free in both groups of patients was accompanied by a decrease in complaints and symptoms characteristic of dry eye syndrome and toxic-allergic conjunctivitis. At the same time, the average total score characterizing drug intolerance, when assessed by the patient, decreased by 2.4 times, and by the attending physician - by 1.9 times. Also in the second group of patients using Brimonidine, a decrease in the level of corneal-compensated intraocular pressure was noted (p < 0.05). In the first group of patients who used a fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol, the level of corneal-compensated intraocular pressure remained unchanged (p > 0.05). Conclusion The use of preservative-free forms of drugs in the treatment of patients with glaucoma is justified both as initial therapy and as a replacement for current therapy. Key words: glaucoma; ophthalmotonus; intraocular pressure; preservative-free therapy

Modern technologies in ophtalmologyVol. 60(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.