Warming Increases Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> (<scp>eDNA</scp>) Removal Rates in Flowing Waters

ABSTRACT The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for aquatic conservation is emerging, but its value is limited by our understanding of how environmental factors like temperature impact eDNA persistence. Although elevated temperatures are known to increase eDNA decay in lakes and ponds, no studies have experimentally explored the effect of temperature on eDNA fate in flowing waters where physical removal could obscure the effect of temperature on decay rates. We compared eDNA removal rates in n = 12 indoor, recirculating mesocosms under varying water temperatures (20°C, 23°C, 26°C) and found that, for small eDNA particles (0.2–1.0 μm), removal rates were higher at the warmest temperature (Tukey's post hoc, p ≤ 0.03) while removal rates were consistent across temperatures for larger eDNA particles (&gt; 1.0 μm, Tukey's, p &gt; 0.05). Consequently, smaller eDNA particles were removed faster than larger particles at 26°C and 23°C (Tukey's, p &lt; 0.001) compared to 20°C (Tukey's, p = 0.01), resulting in an increase in the proportion of the eDNA sample made up of small particles with downstream transport for the two warmer temperatures (beta linear model, p &lt; 0.001). This suggests eDNA removal in streams reflects a complex interplay between physical trapping and microbial degradation influenced by temperature. Consequently, differences in temperature between geographic locations, seasons, and climates could impact the fate and interpretation of eDNA, even in flowing waters where physical removal contributes substantially to eDNA fate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental DNA
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70094
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Warming Increases Environmental DNA (eDNA) Removal Rates in Flowing Waters

Arial J. Shogren, Gary A. Lamberti, Diogo Bolster, Pedro F. P. Brandão‐Dias et al.
2 citations
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
3.43
article

Warming Increases Environmental DNA (eDNA) Removal Rates in Flowing Waters

Arial J. Shogren, Gary A. Lamberti, Diogo Bolster, Pedro F. P. Brandão‐Dias, Scott Patrick Egan, Kyle J. Bibby, Brett Peters, Elizabeth Curtis, Elise D. Snyder, Abagael N. Pruitt, Jens Tank
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for aquatic conservation is emerging, but its value is limited by our understanding of how environmental factors like temperature impact eDNA persistence. Although elevated temperatures are known to increase eDNA decay in lakes and ponds, no studies have experimentally explored the effect of temperature on eDNA fate in flowing waters where physical removal could obscure the effect of temperature on decay rates. We compared eDNA removal rates in n = 12 indoor, recirculating mesocosms under varying water temperatures (20°C, 23°C, 26°C) and found that, for small eDNA particles (0.2–1.0 μm), removal rates were higher at the warmest temperature (Tukey's post hoc, p ≤ 0.03) while removal rates were consistent across temperatures for larger eDNA particles (&gt; 1.0 μm, Tukey's, p &gt; 0.05). Consequently, smaller eDNA particles were removed faster than larger particles at 26°C and 23°C (Tukey's, p &lt; 0.001) compared to 20°C (Tukey's, p = 0.01), resulting in an increase in the proportion of the eDNA sample made up of small particles with downstream transport for the two warmer temperatures (beta linear model, p &lt; 0.001). This suggests eDNA removal in streams reflects a complex interplay between physical trapping and microbial degradation influenced by temperature. Consequently, differences in temperature between geographic locations, seasons, and climates could impact the fate and interpretation of eDNA, even in flowing waters where physical removal contributes substantially to eDNA fate.

Environmental DNAVol. 7(3)
University of Notre Dame (US), University of Alabama (US), Rice University (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.