Diagnostic accuracy of methods for assessing indicators of regular astigmatism

Relevance Astigmatism (Ac) is a defect of the optical system of the eye that causes uneven defocus of light. Accurate diagnosis of Ac is important for the selection of optical correction, including toric intraocular lenses [1–3]. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of methods for indicating regular astigmatism. Material and methods The study included 83 patients (122 eyes) with regular Ac (> 1.0 D), divided into three groups by Ac type. Automatic refractometry (Tomey RC-5000) was used to determine spherical and cylindrical components, refined by subjective tests (cross-cylinder, duochrome test). Visual acuity was assessed with Tomey TCP-3000P optotypes. Deviations of the cylinder axis (5°, 10°, 15°) were modeled to analyze the impact on vision. Statistical processing included the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Wilcoxon criteria (p < 0.05). Results The coincidence of refractometry data and subjective tests was noted in 34.4% of cases, discrepancies - in 70%. Significant differences in the cylinder size were revealed with reverse Ac (p < 0.0005). Subjective correction increased visual acuity. A deviation of the cylinder axis by 10-15° reduced vision regardless of the Ac type, and by 5° - only with direct Ac counterclockwise. Conclusion For maximum visual acuity when correcting regular Ac, the data of automatic refractometry require clarification by subjective tests [4, 5]. The results of modeling axis deviations are useful for assessing the effectiveness of toric IOL implantation. Key words: regular astigmatism; automatic refractometry; cross-cylinder; toric intraocular lens

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Modern technologies in ophtalmology
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25276/2312-4911-2025-2-225-226
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic accuracy of methods for assessing indicators of regular astigmatism

A.N. Evdokimova, Avetisov Sé, L.M. Agaeva, T.A. Mamedov
Modern technologies in ophtalmology
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
article

Diagnostic accuracy of methods for assessing indicators of regular astigmatism

A.N. Evdokimova, Avetisov Sé, L.M. Agaeva, T.A. Mamedov
article en

Abstract

Relevance Astigmatism (Ac) is a defect of the optical system of the eye that causes uneven defocus of light. Accurate diagnosis of Ac is important for the selection of optical correction, including toric intraocular lenses [1–3]. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of methods for indicating regular astigmatism. Material and methods The study included 83 patients (122 eyes) with regular Ac (> 1.0 D), divided into three groups by Ac type. Automatic refractometry (Tomey RC-5000) was used to determine spherical and cylindrical components, refined by subjective tests (cross-cylinder, duochrome test). Visual acuity was assessed with Tomey TCP-3000P optotypes. Deviations of the cylinder axis (5°, 10°, 15°) were modeled to analyze the impact on vision. Statistical processing included the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Wilcoxon criteria (p < 0.05). Results The coincidence of refractometry data and subjective tests was noted in 34.4% of cases, discrepancies - in 70%. Significant differences in the cylinder size were revealed with reverse Ac (p < 0.0005). Subjective correction increased visual acuity. A deviation of the cylinder axis by 10-15° reduced vision regardless of the Ac type, and by 5° - only with direct Ac counterclockwise. Conclusion For maximum visual acuity when correcting regular Ac, the data of automatic refractometry require clarification by subjective tests [4, 5]. The results of modeling axis deviations are useful for assessing the effectiveness of toric IOL implantation. Key words: regular astigmatism; automatic refractometry; cross-cylinder; toric intraocular lens

Modern technologies in ophtalmologyVol. 60(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.