Men in Family Science Courses: Perspectives of Family Science Faculty and Administrators

The goal of this qualitative study is to describe the perspectives of higher education family science faculty and administrators regarding men’s enrollment in family science courses. University family science courses educate students on how to promote developmental potential for individuals, couples, and families. Information from these classes can assist students’ personal and professional development regardless of gender, yet there are far fewer men enrolled in these courses compared to women. Data come from 78 faculty members and 12 administrators from randomly selected universities using the National Council on Family Relations’ Degree Programs in Family Science directory. Using coding reliability thematic analysis, three broad themes were identified: (1) Men’s enrollment in family science is impacted by broader societal forces; (2) “Family science is for EVERYONE”; and (3) Consequences of increasing men’s enrollment in family science courses. Results illustrate that men could benefit from family science courses, but societal influences are likely to inhibit men’s enrollment. Increasing men’s enrollment could alter the current structure of family science courses. Based on these results, strategies are proffered to recruit students across gender and other identities into family science courses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Sciences and Extension
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55533/2325-5226.1533
Primary Topic
Architecture, Design, and Social History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Men in Family Science Courses: Perspectives of Family Science Faculty and Administrators

Michael R. Langlais, J. Mitchell Vaterlaus, Sophia Rotella
Journal of Human Sciences and Extension
Architecture, Design, and Social History
article

Men in Family Science Courses: Perspectives of Family Science Faculty and Administrators

Michael R. Langlais, J. Mitchell Vaterlaus, Sophia Rotella
article en

Abstract

The goal of this qualitative study is to describe the perspectives of higher education family science faculty and administrators regarding men’s enrollment in family science courses. University family science courses educate students on how to promote developmental potential for individuals, couples, and families. Information from these classes can assist students’ personal and professional development regardless of gender, yet there are far fewer men enrolled in these courses compared to women. Data come from 78 faculty members and 12 administrators from randomly selected universities using the National Council on Family Relations’ Degree Programs in Family Science directory. Using coding reliability thematic analysis, three broad themes were identified: (1) Men’s enrollment in family science is impacted by broader societal forces; (2) “Family science is for EVERYONE”; and (3) Consequences of increasing men’s enrollment in family science courses. Results illustrate that men could benefit from family science courses, but societal influences are likely to inhibit men’s enrollment. Increasing men’s enrollment could alter the current structure of family science courses. Based on these results, strategies are proffered to recruit students across gender and other identities into family science courses.

Journal of Human Sciences and ExtensionVol. 13(1)
Baylor University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Architecture, Design, and Social History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Men in Family Science Courses: Perspectives of Family Science Faculty and Administrators — Michael R. Langlais, J. Mitchell Vaterlaus, et al. · Journal of Human Sciences and Extension (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS