Testing the greenwashing assessment framework

Greenwashing is of growing concern as the world struggles to respond to the triple planetary crises of pollution, climate change, and biodiversity loss. New terminology to label greenwashing has entered public discourse and new policies and legal processes have challenged green claims, particularly in advertising. These developments demand a review and revision of the terminology used in greenwashing research and analysis of its application to statements made by businesses, governments, and other organizations. This paper focuses on just that, making two key academic contributions to the growing interdisciplinary literature on greenwashing. First, we empirically test, for the first time, the greenwashing assessment framework, an analytical means to assess greenwashing. Second, we build on our empirical findings to propose a revision to this framework. This testing makes an important contribution to help the public, managers, policy makers, and journalists navigate the complex information domain surrounding environmental issues.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Society
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5751/es-16106-300231
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the greenwashing assessment framework

Tim Wood, Clemens Kaupa, Melissa Aronczyk, Francesco Nicola Tubiello et al.
4 citations
Ecology and Society
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
9.69
article

Testing the greenwashing assessment framework

Tim Wood, Clemens Kaupa, Melissa Aronczyk, Francesco Nicola Tubiello, Noemi Nemes, Brenda McNally, Tone Smith, Stephen J. Scanlan, A. Wren Montgomery, Stephanie Hill
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Greenwashing is of growing concern as the world struggles to respond to the triple planetary crises of pollution, climate change, and biodiversity loss. New terminology to label greenwashing has entered public discourse and new policies and legal processes have challenged green claims, particularly in advertising. These developments demand a review and revision of the terminology used in greenwashing research and analysis of its application to statements made by businesses, governments, and other organizations. This paper focuses on just that, making two key academic contributions to the growing interdisciplinary literature on greenwashing. First, we empirically test, for the first time, the greenwashing assessment framework, an analytical means to assess greenwashing. Second, we build on our empirical findings to propose a revision to this framework. This testing makes an important contribution to help the public, managers, policy makers, and journalists navigate the complex information domain surrounding environmental issues.

Ecology and SocietyVol. 30(2)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
9.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Testing the greenwashing assessment framework — Tim Wood, Clemens Kaupa, et al. · Ecology and Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS